OMC vs. WPP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 25, 2025

Here’s a clear look at OMC and WPP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

OMC is a standard domestic listing, while WPP trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

Symbol	OMC	WPP
Company Name	Omnicom Group Inc.	WPP plc
Country	United States	United Kingdom
GICS Sector	Communication Services	Communication Services
GICS Industry	Media	Media
Market Capitalization	15.05 billion USD	5.84 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	March 17, 1980	December 29, 1987
Security Type	Common Stock	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of OMC and WPP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

OMC vs. WPP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	OMC	WPP
5-Day Price Return	3.05%	6.00%
13-Week Price Return	0.97%	-32.20%
26-Week Price Return	-5.16%	-48.04%
52-Week Price Return	-19.81%	-44.48%
Month-to-Date Return	7.86%	-2.17%
Year-to-Date Return	-9.68%	-51.52%
10-Day Avg. Volume	3.37M	3.85M
3-Month Avg. Volume	3.79M	3.28M
3-Month Volatility	31.39%	45.43%
Beta	0.97	0.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

OMC

32.44%

Media Industry

Max: 34.77%
Q3: 16.01%
Median: 10.70%
Q1: 2.80%
Min: -2.36%

In the upper quartile for the Media industry, OMC’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

WPP

11.48%

Media Industry

Max: 34.77%
Q3: 16.01%
Median: 10.70%
Q1: 2.80%
Min: -2.36%

WPP’s Return on Equity of 11.48% is on par with the norm for the Media industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

OMC

8.67%

Media Industry

Max: 16.04%
Q3: 10.15%
Median: 5.18%
Q1: 2.39%
Min: -3.66%

OMC’s Net Profit Margin of 8.67% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Media industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WPP

2.69%

Media Industry

Max: 16.04%
Q3: 10.15%
Median: 5.18%
Q1: 2.39%
Min: -3.66%

WPP’s Net Profit Margin of 2.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Media industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

OMC

13.68%

Media Industry

Max: 24.65%
Q3: 13.68%
Median: 8.96%
Q1: 4.53%
Min: -8.09%

OMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.68% is around the midpoint for the Media industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WPP

7.89%

Media Industry

Max: 24.65%
Q3: 13.68%
Median: 8.96%
Q1: 4.53%
Min: -8.09%

WPP’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.89% is around the midpoint for the Media industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	OMC	WPP
Return on Equity (TTM)	32.44%	11.48%
Return on Assets (TTM)	4.78%	1.56%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	8.67%	2.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	13.68%	7.89%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	26.98%	15.86%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

OMC

0.92

Media Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.79
Median: 1.39
Q1: 0.92
Min: 0.24

OMC’s Current Ratio of 0.92 aligns with the median group of the Media industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WPP

0.86

Media Industry

Max: 2.97
Q3: 1.79
Median: 1.39
Q1: 0.92
Min: 0.24

WPP’s Current Ratio of 0.86 falls into the lower quartile for the Media industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Media industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

OMC

1.41

Media Industry

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

OMC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Media industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.41. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

WPP

2.13

Media Industry

Max: 2.02
Q3: 1.06
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.31
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.13, WPP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Media industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Media industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

OMC

23.63

Media Industry

Max: 44.57
Q3: 23.07
Median: 4.52
Q1: 2.14
Min: -10.82

OMC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.63 is in the upper quartile for the Media industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

WPP

4.68

Media Industry

Max: 44.57
Q3: 23.07
Median: 4.52
Q1: 2.14
Min: -10.82

WPP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.68 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Media industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	OMC	WPP
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.92	0.86
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.87	0.86
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	1.41	2.13
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	23.63	4.68

Growth

Revenue Growth

OMC vs. WPP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

OMC vs. WPP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

OMC

3.66%

Media Industry

Max: 7.76%
Q3: 4.16%
Median: 1.67%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

OMC’s Dividend Yield of 3.66% is consistent with its peers in the Media industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WPP

0.00%

Media Industry

Max: 7.76%
Q3: 4.16%
Median: 1.67%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

WPP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

OMC

39.97%

Media Industry

Max: 165.03%
Q3: 96.17%
Median: 45.64%
Q1: 14.80%
Min: 0.00%

OMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 39.97% is within the typical range for the Media industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WPP

126.11%

Media Industry

Max: 165.03%
Q3: 96.17%
Median: 45.64%
Q1: 14.80%
Min: 0.00%

WPP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 126.11% is in the upper quartile for the Media industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	OMC	WPP
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.66%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	39.97%	126.11%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

OMC

10.91

Media Industry

Max: 49.10
Q3: 35.07
Median: 17.34
Q1: 10.39
Min: 5.81

OMC’s P/E Ratio of 10.91 is within the middle range for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

WPP

11.37

Media Industry

Max: 49.10
Q3: 35.07
Median: 17.34
Q1: 10.39
Min: 5.81

WPP’s P/E Ratio of 11.37 is within the middle range for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

OMC

0.95

Media Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

OMC’s P/S Ratio of 0.95 aligns with the market consensus for the Media industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WPP

0.31

Media Industry

Max: 3.23
Q3: 1.85
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.78
Min: 0.22

In the lower quartile for the Media industry, WPP’s P/S Ratio of 0.31 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Media industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

OMC

3.13

Media Industry

Max: 4.30
Q3: 2.57
Median: 1.83
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.51

OMC’s P/B Ratio of 3.13 is in the upper tier for the Media industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

WPP

1.75

Media Industry

Max: 4.30
Q3: 2.57
Median: 1.83
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.51

WPP’s P/B Ratio of 1.75 is within the conventional range for the Media industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OMC vs. WPP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Media industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	OMC	WPP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	10.91	11.37
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.95	0.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	3.13	1.75
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	5.82	2.38