Seek Returns logo

OMAB vs. PAC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at OMAB and PAC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both OMAB and PAC are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolOMABPAC
Company NameGrupo Aeroportuario del Centro Norte, S.A.B. de C.V.Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacífico, S.A.B. de C.V.
CountryMexicoMexico
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryTransportation InfrastructureTransportation Infrastructure
Market Capitalization5.13 billion USD12.35 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 29, 2006February 27, 2006
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of OMAB and PAC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

OMAB vs. PAC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolOMABPAC
5-Day Price Return-0.44%-2.95%
13-Week Price Return7.49%-0.18%
26-Week Price Return20.93%13.31%
52-Week Price Return66.06%51.23%
Month-to-Date Return-0.54%5.75%
Year-to-Date Return38.68%25.03%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.37M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.86M0.69M
3-Month Volatility23.27%24.54%
Beta1.391.41

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

OMAB

52.10%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

OMAB’s Return on Equity of 52.10% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PAC

42.80%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
26.85%
Q3
15.47%
Median
10.39%
Q1
7.70%
Min
0.79%

PAC’s Return on Equity of 42.80% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

OMAB

32.94%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

A Net Profit Margin of 32.94% places OMAB in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PAC

23.19%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
49.26%
Q3
27.75%
Median
17.98%
Q1
10.18%
Min
4.19%

PAC’s Net Profit Margin of 23.19% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

OMAB

55.71%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

An Operating Profit Margin of 55.71% places OMAB in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PAC

42.29%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
60.91%
Q3
43.57%
Median
30.58%
Q1
16.77%
Min
1.18%

PAC’s Operating Profit Margin of 42.29% is around the midpoint for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolOMABPAC
Return on Equity (TTM)52.10%42.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.32%11.42%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)32.94%23.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)55.71%42.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.59%100.00%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

OMAB

1.03

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

OMAB’s Current Ratio of 1.03 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PAC

0.93

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.35
Q3
1.90
Median
1.35
Q1
0.86
Min
0.28

PAC’s Current Ratio of 0.93 aligns with the median group of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

OMAB

1.59

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

OMAB’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.59 is typical for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PAC

2.48

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
3.70
Q3
1.70
Median
0.83
Q1
0.30
Min
0.04

PAC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Transportation Infrastructure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.48. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

OMAB

7.97

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

OMAB’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 7.97 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PAC

5.20

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
29.26
Q3
20.33
Median
8.92
Q1
5.22
Min
2.01

In the lower quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, PAC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.20 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolOMABPAC
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.030.93
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.030.93
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.592.48
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)7.975.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

OMAB vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

OMAB vs. PAC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

OMAB

4.86%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.86%, OMAB offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

PAC

2.53%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
7.48%
Q3
3.76%
Median
2.40%
Q1
1.13%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Transportation Infrastructure industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

OMAB

111.39%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

OMAB’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 111.39% is in the upper quartile for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

PAC

71.16%

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
197.82%
Q3
109.11%
Median
70.69%
Q1
33.40%
Min
0.00%

PAC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 71.16% is within the typical range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolOMABPAC
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.86%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)111.39%71.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

OMAB

17.25

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

OMAB’s P/E Ratio of 17.25 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PAC

19.76

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
35.90
Q3
21.76
Median
17.41
Q1
12.31
Min
5.46

PAC’s P/E Ratio of 19.76 is within the middle range for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

OMAB

5.68

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

OMAB’s P/S Ratio of 5.68 is in the upper echelon for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PAC

4.58

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
10.76
Q3
5.52
Median
2.96
Q1
1.59
Min
0.84

PAC’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

OMAB

9.92

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.92, OMAB’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PAC

9.90

Transportation Infrastructure Industry

Max
4.46
Q3
2.80
Median
1.80
Q1
1.12
Min
0.37

At 9.90, PAC’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Transportation Infrastructure industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OMAB vs. PAC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Transportation Infrastructure industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolOMABPAC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.2519.76
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.684.58
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.929.90
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.7918.23