Seek Returns logo

OC vs. VRSK: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at OC and VRSK, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolOCVRSK
Company NameOwens CorningVerisk Analytics, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryBuilding ProductsProfessional Services
Market Capitalization12.78 billion USD37.40 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 1, 2006October 7, 2009
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of OC and VRSK by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

OC vs. VRSK: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolOCVRSK
5-Day Price Return2.93%-1.55%
13-Week Price Return10.97%-15.33%
26-Week Price Return-7.62%-9.29%
52-Week Price Return-10.82%-0.10%
Month-to-Date Return9.63%-3.95%
Year-to-Date Return-10.25%-2.81%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.85M1.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.88M0.94M
3-Month Volatility33.54%21.25%
Beta1.360.87

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

OC

6.42%

Building Products Industry

Max
48.58%
Q3
27.65%
Median
16.01%
Q1
8.81%
Min
-6.66%

OC’s Return on Equity of 6.42% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

VRSK

439.17%

Professional Services Industry

Max
52.17%
Q3
30.06%
Median
22.21%
Q1
11.67%
Min
-13.44%

VRSK’s Return on Equity of 439.17% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

OC

2.98%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.11%
Q3
15.09%
Median
9.48%
Q1
5.16%
Min
-3.43%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s Net Profit Margin of 2.98% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

VRSK

30.67%

Professional Services Industry

Max
26.06%
Q3
13.34%
Median
7.88%
Q1
3.50%
Min
-2.93%

VRSK’s Net Profit Margin of 30.67% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

OC

10.56%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.67%
Q3
18.75%
Median
14.89%
Q1
8.70%
Min
-1.00%

OC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.56% is around the midpoint for the Building Products industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRSK

43.94%

Professional Services Industry

Max
35.84%
Q3
19.38%
Median
12.54%
Q1
7.36%
Min
-5.21%

VRSK’s Operating Profit Margin of 43.94% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolOCVRSK
Return on Equity (TTM)6.42%439.17%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.30%19.55%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.98%30.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.56%43.94%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)29.56%69.39%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

OC

1.52

Building Products Industry

Max
2.87
Q3
2.03
Median
1.60
Q1
1.32
Min
0.88

OC’s Current Ratio of 1.52 aligns with the median group of the Building Products industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRSK

1.53

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.45
Q3
1.65
Median
1.26
Q1
1.10
Min
0.47

VRSK’s Current Ratio of 1.53 aligns with the median group of the Professional Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

OC

1.07

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.66
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

OC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Building Products industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRSK

10.43

Professional Services Industry

Max
2.63
Q3
1.44
Median
0.91
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 10.43, VRSK operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Professional Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

OC

5.32

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
15.31
Q1
6.06
Min
0.85

In the lower quartile for the Building Products industry, OC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.32 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

VRSK

43.51

Professional Services Industry

Max
39.67
Q3
20.05
Median
11.07
Q1
5.36
Min
-2.22

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 43.51, VRSK demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Professional Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolOCVRSK
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.521.53
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.951.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.0710.43
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.3243.51

Growth

Revenue Growth

OC vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

OC vs. VRSK: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

OC

1.77%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.56%
Q3
1.94%
Median
1.04%
Q1
0.66%
Min
0.00%

OC’s Dividend Yield of 1.77% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

VRSK

0.62%

Professional Services Industry

Max
5.28%
Q3
2.51%
Median
1.63%
Q1
0.62%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Professional Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

OC

16.23%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
77.74%
Median
29.49%
Q1
16.25%
Min
0.00%

OC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.23% is in the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

VRSK

25.76%

Professional Services Industry

Max
109.23%
Q3
64.39%
Median
47.00%
Q1
20.35%
Min
0.00%

VRSK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 25.76% is within the typical range for the Professional Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolOCVRSK
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.77%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.23%25.76%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

OC

37.71

Building Products Industry

Max
66.79
Q3
37.37
Median
21.86
Q1
17.57
Min
9.70

A P/E Ratio of 37.71 places OC in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

VRSK

41.55

Professional Services Industry

Max
49.59
Q3
36.59
Median
28.13
Q1
18.55
Min
10.07

A P/E Ratio of 41.55 places VRSK in the upper quartile for the Professional Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

OC

1.12

Building Products Industry

Max
6.40
Q3
3.25
Median
1.65
Q1
1.11
Min
0.34

OC’s P/S Ratio of 1.12 aligns with the market consensus for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRSK

12.75

Professional Services Industry

Max
9.54
Q3
5.11
Median
2.10
Q1
0.75
Min
0.11

With a P/S Ratio of 12.75, VRSK trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Professional Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

OC

2.27

Building Products Industry

Max
13.31
Q3
6.85
Median
3.20
Q1
1.71
Min
0.73

OC’s P/B Ratio of 2.27 is within the conventional range for the Building Products industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRSK

139.79

Professional Services Industry

Max
13.75
Q3
8.87
Median
4.35
Q1
2.43
Min
0.54

At 139.79, VRSK’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Professional Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

OC vs. VRSK: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Building Products and Professional Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolOCVRSK
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.7141.55
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.1212.75
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.27139.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.7737.30