NWG vs. V: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 7, 2025

Here’s a clear look at NWG and V, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NWG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, V is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	NWG	V
Company Name	NatWest Group plc	Visa Inc.
Country	United Kingdom	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	59.78 billion USD	679.02 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	October 18, 2007	March 19, 2008
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NWG and V by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NWG vs. V: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	NWG	V
5-Day Price Return	1.42%	2.85%
13-Week Price Return	7.93%	-2.51%
26-Week Price Return	14.96%	-0.18%
52-Week Price Return	54.10%	26.30%
Month-to-Date Return	1.19%	2.48%
Year-to-Date Return	31.26%	10.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume	17.88M	7.02M
3-Month Avg. Volume	13.55M	6.40M
3-Month Volatility	25.58%	16.86%
Beta	1.54	0.83

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NWG

13.01%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

NWG’s Return on Equity of 13.01% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

V

52.65%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 39.28%
Q3: 18.88%
Median: 9.97%
Q1: 4.03%
Min: -10.25%

V’s Return on Equity of 52.65% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Financial Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NWG

31.24%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

NWG’s Net Profit Margin of 31.24% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

V

52.16%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.16%
Q3: 25.35%
Median: 12.68%
Q1: 6.11%
Min: -11.69%

A Net Profit Margin of 52.16% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NWG

40.79%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

NWG’s Operating Profit Margin of 40.79% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

V

62.21%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 75.57%
Q3: 37.78%
Median: 19.09%
Q1: 10.04%
Min: -19.42%

An Operating Profit Margin of 62.21% places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	NWG	V
Return on Equity (TTM)	13.01%	52.65%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.73%	21.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	31.24%	52.16%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	40.79%	62.21%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	80.23%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NWG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

V

1.12

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.83
Q3: 2.70
Median: 1.44
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NWG

2.77

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

V

0.65

Financial Services Industry

Max: 5.07
Q3: 2.14
Median: 0.66
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NWG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

V

24.71

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	NWG	V
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.12
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	1.06
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	2.77	0.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	24.71

Growth

Revenue Growth

NWG vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NWG vs. V: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NWG

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

NWG currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

V

0.68%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.12%
Q3: 3.37%
Median: 1.70%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Yield of 0.68% is consistent with its peers in the Financial Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NWG

48.52%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

NWG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 48.52% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

V

22.33%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 132.10%
Q3: 64.32%
Median: 18.23%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

V’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.33% is within the typical range for the Financial Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	NWG	V
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.68%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	48.52%	22.33%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NWG

8.08

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

NWG’s P/E Ratio of 8.08 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

V

32.94

Financial Services Industry

Max: 45.81
Q3: 30.21
Median: 16.29
Q1: 10.14
Min: 0.70

A P/E Ratio of 32.94 places V in the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NWG

1.17

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

V

17.18

Financial Services Industry

Max: 10.88
Q3: 5.34
Median: 2.64
Q1: 1.24
Min: 0.06

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NWG

0.99

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

NWG’s P/B Ratio of 0.99 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

V

17.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.93
Q3: 3.78
Median: 1.49
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.08

At 17.81, V’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Financial Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NWG vs. V: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	NWG	V
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	8.08	32.94
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.17	17.18
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.99	17.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	8.28	30.26