Seek Returns logo

NVT vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NVT and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNVTPWR
Company NamenVent Electric plcQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryElectrical EquipmentConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization14.17 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateApril 24, 2018February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NVT and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NVT vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNVTPWR
5-Day Price Return-1.96%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return32.27%9.04%
26-Week Price Return30.74%29.23%
52-Week Price Return33.58%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return12.27%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return29.17%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.86M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.04M1.19M
3-Month Volatility36.76%22.91%
Beta1.381.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NVT

17.16%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
37.56%
Q3
20.60%
Median
14.38%
Q1
4.35%
Min
0.90%

NVT’s Return on Equity of 17.16% is on par with the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NVT

17.72%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
20.43%
Q3
10.97%
Median
6.07%
Q1
3.16%
Min
0.29%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.72% places NVT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NVT

16.24%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
26.20%
Q3
14.31%
Median
7.54%
Q1
3.77%
Min
-5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.24% places NVT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNVTPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)17.16%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.64%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.72%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.24%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.20%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NVT

1.67

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.99
Median
1.41
Q1
1.07
Min
0.80

NVT’s Current Ratio of 1.67 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NVT

0.50

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.99
Median
0.56
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

NVT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.50 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NVT

5.05

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
36.12
Q3
19.29
Median
9.38
Q1
1.16
Min
-10.92

NVT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNVTPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.671.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.151.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.500.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.0510.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

NVT vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NVT vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NVT

0.92%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
2.20%
Q3
1.53%
Median
1.01%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVT’s Dividend Yield of 0.92% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NVT

22.00%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
119.44%
Q3
51.87%
Median
27.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NVT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.00% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNVTPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.92%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.00%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NVT

24.03

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
81.85
Q3
44.17
Median
27.61
Q1
18.62
Min
7.73

NVT’s P/E Ratio of 24.03 is within the middle range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NVT

4.26

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.18
Q3
4.02
Median
1.84
Q1
0.97
Min
0.44

NVT’s P/S Ratio of 4.26 is in the upper echelon for the Electrical Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NVT

3.43

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max
8.50
Q3
4.53
Median
3.39
Q1
1.70
Min
0.51

NVT’s P/B Ratio of 3.43 is within the conventional range for the Electrical Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NVT vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Electrical Equipment and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNVTPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)24.0357.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.262.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.437.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)26.3540.85