Seek Returns logo

NVR vs. VIPS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NVR and VIPS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NVR is a standard domestic listing, while VIPS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolNVRVIPS
Company NameNVR, Inc.Vipshop Holdings Limited
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHousehold DurablesBroadline Retail
Market Capitalization22.45 billion USD8.36 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 22, 1985March 23, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NVR and VIPS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NVR vs. VIPS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNVRVIPS
5-Day Price Return-1.46%2.17%
13-Week Price Return14.93%16.56%
26-Week Price Return13.23%16.40%
52-Week Price Return-9.54%35.57%
Month-to-Date Return7.65%12.39%
Year-to-Date Return-0.64%25.91%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.02M2.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.02M3.18M
3-Month Volatility30.14%27.85%
Beta0.950.70

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NVR

37.35%

Household Durables Industry

Max
26.99%
Q3
17.28%
Median
12.66%
Q1
7.34%
Min
0.07%

NVR’s Return on Equity of 37.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Household Durables industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

VIPS

18.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
49.17%
Q3
28.98%
Median
19.22%
Q1
10.86%
Min
-11.14%

VIPS’s Return on Equity of 18.88% is on par with the norm for the Broadline Retail industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NVR

14.18%

Household Durables Industry

Max
15.50%
Q3
8.99%
Median
6.57%
Q1
4.33%
Min
-0.49%

A Net Profit Margin of 14.18% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VIPS

6.88%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
19.78%
Q3
11.90%
Median
8.63%
Q1
5.21%
Min
0.82%

VIPS’s Net Profit Margin of 6.88% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NVR

18.55%

Household Durables Industry

Max
20.22%
Q3
12.29%
Median
9.54%
Q1
6.30%
Min
-1.92%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.55% places NVR in the upper quartile for the Household Durables industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

VIPS

8.06%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
27.23%
Q3
15.96%
Median
11.13%
Q1
8.31%
Min
1.77%

VIPS’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.06% is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNVRVIPS
Return on Equity (TTM)37.35%18.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)24.32%10.28%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)14.18%6.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.55%8.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)25.28%23.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

3.36

Household Durables Industry

Max
9.23
Q3
4.50
Median
2.35
Q1
1.29
Min
0.70

NVR’s Current Ratio of 3.36 aligns with the median group of the Household Durables industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VIPS

1.28

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
3.54
Q3
2.42
Median
1.49
Q1
1.22
Min
0.67

VIPS’s Current Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the median group of the Broadline Retail industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

0.24

Household Durables Industry

Max
1.84
Q3
0.90
Median
0.34
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

NVR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.24 is typical for the Household Durables industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

VIPS

0.11

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
1.34
Median
0.63
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.11 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NVR

77.14

Household Durables Industry

Max
140.40
Q3
77.14
Median
24.53
Q1
5.69
Min
-17.01

NVR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 77.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Household Durables industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VIPS

150.47

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
37.34
Q3
20.63
Median
11.28
Q1
4.22
Min
-19.29

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 150.47, VIPS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Broadline Retail industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNVRVIPS
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.361.28
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.531.14
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.240.11
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)77.14150.47

Growth

Revenue Growth

NVR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NVR vs. VIPS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
8.95%
Q3
4.19%
Median
1.88%
Q1
0.03%
Min
0.00%

NVR currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.46%
Q3
2.38%
Median
0.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NVR

0.00%

Household Durables Industry

Max
125.12%
Q3
62.43%
Median
39.18%
Q1
5.55%
Min
0.00%

NVR has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

VIPS

0.00%

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
131.17%
Q3
63.48%
Median
29.43%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

VIPS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNVRVIPS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NVR

15.48

Household Durables Industry

Max
29.75
Q3
18.88
Median
13.25
Q1
9.26
Min
6.32

NVR’s P/E Ratio of 15.48 is within the middle range for the Household Durables industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

VIPS

7.97

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
66.12
Q3
35.17
Median
16.29
Q1
10.47
Min
5.94

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/E Ratio of 7.97 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NVR

2.19

Household Durables Industry

Max
2.12
Q3
1.21
Median
0.83
Q1
0.51
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.19, NVR trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Household Durables industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

VIPS

0.55

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
5.40
Q3
3.33
Median
2.04
Q1
0.80
Min
0.16

In the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry, VIPS’s P/S Ratio of 0.55 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NVR

5.62

Household Durables Industry

Max
4.21
Q3
2.29
Median
1.34
Q1
0.98
Min
0.59

At 5.62, NVR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Household Durables industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

VIPS

1.43

Broadline Retail Industry

Max
9.06
Q3
5.22
Median
3.48
Q1
1.90
Min
0.74

VIPS’s P/B Ratio of 1.43 is in the lower quartile for the Broadline Retail industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

NVR vs. VIPS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Household Durables and Broadline Retail industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNVRVIPS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.487.97
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.190.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.621.43
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)19.46--