Seek Returns logo

NU vs. PRU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NU and PRU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNUPRU
Company NameNu Holdings Ltd.Prudential Financial, Inc.
CountryBrazilUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryBanksInsurance
Market Capitalization73.98 billion USD36.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateDecember 9, 2021December 13, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NU and PRU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NU vs. PRU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNUPRU
5-Day Price Return-4.01%0.18%
13-Week Price Return12.57%-4.64%
26-Week Price Return49.51%-6.86%
52-Week Price Return15.81%-12.55%
Month-to-Date Return-4.37%0.27%
Year-to-Date Return47.78%-12.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume47.69M1.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume58.78M1.62M
3-Month Volatility35.32%21.57%
Beta1.090.99

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NU

27.49%

Banks Industry

Max
25.40%
Q3
15.55%
Median
12.00%
Q1
8.98%
Min
-0.10%

NU’s Return on Equity of 27.49% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Banks industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PRU

5.49%

Insurance Industry

Max
30.96%
Q3
18.76%
Median
14.22%
Q1
10.34%
Min
1.73%

PRU’s Return on Equity of 5.49% is in the lower quartile for the Insurance industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NU

17.90%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.73%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.56%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, NU’s Net Profit Margin of 17.90% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PRU

2.96%

Insurance Industry

Max
26.78%
Q3
14.69%
Median
9.87%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-3.51%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, PRU’s Net Profit Margin of 2.96% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NU

24.64%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.73%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
12.28%

NU’s Operating Profit Margin of 24.64% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

PRU

3.74%

Insurance Industry

Max
34.52%
Q3
20.17%
Median
14.46%
Q1
9.62%
Min
-2.51%

In the Insurance industry, Operating Profit Margin is often not the primary measure of operational efficiency.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNUPRU
Return on Equity (TTM)27.49%5.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.27%0.22%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.90%2.96%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)24.64%3.74%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.42%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NU

0.18

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PRU

--

Insurance Industry

Max
2.97
Q3
1.37
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

For the Insurance industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NU

4.18

Banks Industry

Max
5.78
Q3
2.66
Median
1.05
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

PRU

0.71

Insurance Industry

Max
1.25
Q3
0.65
Median
0.34
Q1
0.23
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Insurance industry.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NU

-0.91

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

PRU

--

Insurance Industry

Max
43.68
Q3
21.45
Median
9.67
Q1
3.55
Min
-5.73

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Insurance industry.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNUPRU
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.18--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.18--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)4.180.71
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-0.91--

Growth

Revenue Growth

NU vs. PRU: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NU vs. PRU: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NU

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max
11.03%
Q3
6.00%
Median
3.87%
Q1
2.41%
Min
0.00%

NU currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PRU

5.25%

Insurance Industry

Max
9.80%
Q3
5.18%
Median
3.58%
Q1
2.07%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 5.25%, PRU offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Insurance industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NU

0.00%

Banks Industry

Max
134.24%
Q3
79.39%
Median
55.09%
Q1
36.09%
Min
0.00%

NU has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PRU

85.37%

Insurance Industry

Max
169.40%
Q3
85.57%
Median
53.26%
Q1
23.68%
Min
0.00%

PRU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.37% is within the typical range for the Insurance industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNUPRU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%5.25%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%85.37%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NU

32.07

Banks Industry

Max
22.69
Q3
13.75
Median
10.32
Q1
7.73
Min
2.59

At 32.07, NU’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Banks industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PRU

22.29

Insurance Industry

Max
30.75
Q3
18.11
Median
12.67
Q1
9.66
Min
2.87

A P/E Ratio of 22.29 places PRU in the upper quartile for the Insurance industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NU

5.74

Banks Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

PRU

0.66

Insurance Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
1.88
Median
1.22
Q1
0.80
Min
0.23

In the lower quartile for the Insurance industry, PRU’s P/S Ratio of 0.66 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NU

6.90

Banks Industry

Max
2.09
Q3
1.40
Median
1.11
Q1
0.86
Min
0.29

At 6.90, NU’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Banks industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

PRU

1.24

Insurance Industry

Max
4.57
Q3
2.56
Median
1.88
Q1
1.20
Min
0.17

PRU’s P/B Ratio of 1.24 is within the conventional range for the Insurance industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NU vs. PRU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Insurance industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNUPRU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.0722.29
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.740.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.901.24
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)15.497.92