Seek Returns logo

NTES vs. UMC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTES and UMC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both NTES and UMC are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolNTESUMC
Company NameNetEase, Inc.United Microelectronics Corporation
CountryChinaTaiwan
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
Market Capitalization100.28 billion USD18.96 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 2000September 19, 2000
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTES and UMC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTES vs. UMC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTESUMC
5-Day Price Return0.46%1.58%
13-Week Price Return18.18%2.86%
26-Week Price Return46.68%-0.66%
52-Week Price Return54.63%8.46%
Month-to-Date Return1.28%-1.32%
Year-to-Date Return72.55%4.41%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.55M66.90M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.75M44.11M
3-Month Volatility30.00%20.70%
Beta0.690.24

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UMC

10.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

UMC’s Return on Equity of 10.76% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UMC

16.69%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

UMC’s Net Profit Margin of 16.69% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UMC

19.65%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

UMC’s Operating Profit Margin of 19.65% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTESUMC
Return on Equity (TTM)24.25%10.76%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.31%7.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.19%16.69%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.43%19.65%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.17%29.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UMC

1.77

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

UMC’s Current Ratio of 1.77 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UMC

0.20

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

UMC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.20 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UMC

313.16

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 313.16, UMC demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTESUMC
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.231.77
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.101.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.20
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)161.13313.16

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTES vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTES vs. UMC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTES

1.93%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.93%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UMC

6.76%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Yield of 6.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UMC

163.64%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UMC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 163.64% is in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTESUMC
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.93%6.76%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.90%163.64%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTES

19.11

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 19.11 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UMC

14.03

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/E Ratio of 14.03 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTES

5.96

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.96 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UMC

2.34

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, UMC’s P/S Ratio of 2.34 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

4.06

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.06 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UMC

1.65

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

UMC’s P/B Ratio of 1.65 is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

NTES vs. UMC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTESUMC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.1114.03
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.962.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.061.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.7715.17