Seek Returns logo

NTES vs. UI: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTES and UI, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UI is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolNTESUI
Company NameNetEase, Inc.Ubiquiti Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesInformation Technology
GICS IndustryEntertainmentCommunications Equipment
Market Capitalization83.01 billion USD23.87 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 2000October 14, 2011
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTES and UI by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTES vs. UI: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTESUI
5-Day Price Return0.66%-5.42%
13-Week Price Return9.59%-8.17%
26-Week Price Return24.53%14.88%
52-Week Price Return41.03%120.33%
Month-to-Date Return0.17%-9.39%
Year-to-Date Return46.31%18.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.03M0.13M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.02M0.11M
3-Month Volatility24.86%46.20%
Beta0.661.40

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UI

217.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
32.05%
Q3
19.58%
Median
11.77%
Q1
2.23%
Min
-11.93%

UI’s Return on Equity of 217.64% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UI

23.64%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
23.65%
Q3
14.32%
Median
5.31%
Q1
1.45%
Min
-12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 23.64% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UI

30.71%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
42.27%
Q3
18.90%
Median
6.21%
Q1
2.97%
Min
-20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 30.71% places UI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTESUI
Return on Equity (TTM)24.25%217.64%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.31%45.81%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.19%23.64%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.43%30.71%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.17%42.16%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UI

1.39

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.72
Q3
1.72
Median
1.46
Q1
1.18
Min
0.93

UI’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UI

0.78

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.55
Q3
0.92
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

UI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.78 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UI

6.64

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
181.73
Q3
113.63
Median
7.59
Q1
3.82
Min
-5.39

UI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.64 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTESUI
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.231.39
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.100.56
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.78
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)161.136.64

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTES vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTES vs. UI: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UI

0.62%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.88%
Q3
2.75%
Median
0.93%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Yield of 0.62% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UI

26.41%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
55.91%
Median
28.42%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 26.41% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTESUI
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.18%0.62%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.90%26.41%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UI

42.74

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
57.30
Q3
47.92
Median
27.50
Q1
17.89
Min
13.89

UI’s P/E Ratio of 42.74 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UI

10.11

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.03
Q3
5.53
Median
2.20
Q1
0.99
Min
0.40

UI’s P/S Ratio of 10.11 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UI

43.03

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
9.66
Q3
5.60
Median
3.73
Q1
2.67
Min
0.30

At 43.03, UI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES vs. UI: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Communications Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTESUI
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.9442.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.2810.11
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0943.03
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.0932.03