Seek Returns logo

NTES vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTES and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NTES trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolNTESUBER
Company NameNetEase, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryChinaUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization83.01 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 2000May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTES and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTES vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTESUBER
5-Day Price Return0.66%2.55%
13-Week Price Return9.59%1.37%
26-Week Price Return24.53%16.74%
52-Week Price Return41.03%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return0.17%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return46.31%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.03M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.02M20.55M
3-Month Volatility24.86%29.59%
Beta0.661.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTES

24.25%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s Return on Equity of 24.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.19%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 31.19% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTES

31.43%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 31.43% places NTES in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTESUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)24.25%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)17.31%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)31.19%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)31.43%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)63.17%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

3.23

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NTES’s Current Ratio of 3.23 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

0.08

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NTES’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.08 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTES

161.13

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 161.13, NTES demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Entertainment industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTESUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.231.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)3.100.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.080.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)161.13-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTES vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTES vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTES

2.18%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 2.18%, NTES offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Entertainment industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTES

36.90%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTES’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.90% is within the typical range for the Entertainment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTESUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.18%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.90%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTES

16.94

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

In the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, NTES’s P/E Ratio of 16.94 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTES

5.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NTES’s P/S Ratio of 5.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTES

4.09

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

NTES’s P/B Ratio of 4.09 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NTES vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTESUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.9415.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.284.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.098.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.0922.90