Seek Returns logo

NTAP vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTAP and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNTAPTTWO
Company NameNetApp, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsEntertainment
Market Capitalization21.69 billion USD42.18 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateNovember 21, 1995April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTAP and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTAP vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTAPTTWO
5-Day Price Return-1.04%-1.93%
13-Week Price Return6.79%-2.55%
26-Week Price Return-7.91%8.84%
52-Week Price Return-17.68%51.94%
Month-to-Date Return4.12%2.67%
Year-to-Date Return-6.60%24.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.63M2.28M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.92M2.17M
3-Month Volatility23.33%23.84%
Beta1.451.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTAP

123.03%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
47.24%
Q3
29.40%
Median
9.11%
Q1
6.06%
Min
-0.79%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 123.03% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

18.05%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.86%
Q3
8.17%
Median
4.62%
Q1
3.65%
Min
-0.21%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 18.05% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

20.34%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
17.80%
Q3
10.33%
Median
6.31%
Q1
4.86%
Min
2.53%

NTAP’s Operating Profit Margin of 20.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTAPTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)123.03%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.44%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.05%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.34%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.19%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

1.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
2.47
Q3
1.98
Median
1.40
Q1
1.26
Min
0.70

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.26 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

3.11

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.47
Q3
0.93
Median
0.32
Q1
0.19
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.11, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
204.63
Q3
90.22
Median
21.70
Q1
6.79
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTAPTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.261.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.221.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.110.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.59-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTAP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTAP vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTAP

1.96%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.50%
Q3
3.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.96% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

35.75%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
66.07%
Median
42.79%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.75% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTAPTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.96%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.75%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

18.26

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.16
Q3
27.56
Median
17.85
Q1
12.48
Min
6.21

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 18.26 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

3.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.27
Q3
1.99
Median
0.93
Q1
0.45
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.30 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TTWO

7.26

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 7.26 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

17.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
12.51
Q3
6.11
Median
1.73
Q1
1.01
Min
0.31

At 17.30, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NTAP vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTAPTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)18.26--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.307.26
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)17.3012.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)16.19187.28