Seek Returns logo

NTAP vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NTAP and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNTAPQXO
Company NameNetApp, Inc.QXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryTechnology Hardware, Storage & PeripheralsTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization24.32 billion USD13.40 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateNovember 21, 1995April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NTAP and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NTAP vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNTAPQXO
5-Day Price Return1.46%-0.05%
13-Week Price Return14.20%-9.67%
26-Week Price Return49.27%44.31%
52-Week Price Return-1.66%45.57%
Month-to-Date Return2.84%4.41%
Year-to-Date Return4.94%25.16%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.61M9.27M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.97M8.90M
3-Month Volatility24.64%41.73%
Beta1.412.33

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NTAP

120.04%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
56.93%
Q3
27.52%
Median
9.18%
Q1
5.14%
Min
-1.04%

NTAP’s Return on Equity of 120.04% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

QXO

-0.34%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

QXO has a negative Return on Equity of -0.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

17.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
16.15%
Q3
7.95%
Median
4.80%
Q1
2.20%
Min
-0.29%

NTAP’s Net Profit Margin of 17.77% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

QXO

-1.09%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

QXO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.09%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NTAP

20.70%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
20.70%
Q3
10.74%
Median
6.27%
Q1
4.07%
Min
1.97%

An Operating Profit Margin of 20.70% places NTAP in the upper quartile for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

QXO

-16.12%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -16.12%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNTAPQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)120.04%-0.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)12.17%-0.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)17.77%-1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)20.70%-16.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)70.00%21.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

1.31

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
3.37
Q3
2.04
Median
1.41
Q1
0.98
Min
0.11

NTAP’s Current Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the median group of the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QXO

3.00

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

QXO’s Current Ratio of 3.00 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

2.55

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.85
Median
0.32
Q1
0.11
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.55, NTAP operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

QXO

0.35

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

17.59

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
143.63
Q3
76.01
Median
19.47
Q1
5.91
Min
-23.93

NTAP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 17.59 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNTAPQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.313.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.282.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.550.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)17.59-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

NTAP vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NTAP vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NTAP

1.77%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
4.33%
Q3
3.29%
Median
1.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Yield of 1.77% is consistent with its peers in the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QXO

0.58%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

35.95%

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
142.87%
Q3
77.17%
Median
40.90%
Q1
3.87%
Min
0.00%

NTAP’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 35.95% is within the typical range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNTAPQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.77%0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)35.95%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

20.30

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
43.10
Q3
28.67
Median
19.23
Q1
15.53
Min
9.46

NTAP’s P/E Ratio of 20.30 is within the middle range for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

QXO

--

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

P/E Ratio data for QXO is currently unavailable.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NTAP

3.61

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
5.63
Q3
3.18
Median
1.10
Q1
0.49
Min
0.04

NTAP’s P/S Ratio of 3.61 is in the upper echelon for the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

QXO

6.81

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 6.81, QXO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NTAP

21.54

Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals Industry

Max
13.94
Q3
6.87
Median
1.88
Q1
0.94
Min
0.32

At 21.54, NTAP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

QXO

1.46

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.46 is within the conventional range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NTAP vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Technology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNTAPQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.30--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.616.81
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)21.541.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.34109.41