Seek Returns logo

NSC vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NSC and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNSCPWR
Company NameNorfolk Southern CorporationQuanta Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryGround TransportationConstruction & Engineering
Market Capitalization64.05 billion USD56.01 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJune 2, 1982February 12, 1998
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NSC and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NSC vs. PWR: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNSCPWR
5-Day Price Return1.06%-0.43%
13-Week Price Return17.11%9.04%
26-Week Price Return10.99%29.23%
52-Week Price Return18.38%40.20%
Month-to-Date Return2.69%-7.45%
Year-to-Date Return21.64%18.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.69M1.00M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.75M1.19M
3-Month Volatility18.13%22.91%
Beta1.331.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NSC

23.35%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

NSC’s Return on Equity of 23.35% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

PWR

13.09%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NSC

27.51%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 27.51% places NSC in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

PWR

3.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NSC

41.45%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

NSC’s Operating Profit Margin of 41.45% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

PWR

5.73%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNSCPWR
Return on Equity (TTM)23.35%13.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)7.66%5.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)27.51%3.73%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)41.45%5.73%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)51.67%15.04%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NSC

0.79

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

NSC’s Current Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PWR

1.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NSC

1.17

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

NSC’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.17 is typical for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PWR

0.60

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NSC

5.21

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

NSC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.21 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

PWR

10.76

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNSCPWR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.791.37
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.711.24
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)1.170.60
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.2110.76

Growth

Revenue Growth

NSC vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NSC vs. PWR: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NSC

1.90%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

NSC’s Dividend Yield of 1.90% is consistent with its peers in the Ground Transportation industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

PWR

0.10%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NSC

36.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

NSC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.42% is within the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PWR

5.92%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNSCPWR
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.90%0.10%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)36.42%5.92%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NSC

19.18

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

NSC’s P/E Ratio of 19.18 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

PWR

57.10

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 57.10, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NSC

5.28

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 5.28, NSC trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

PWR

2.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.13 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NSC

3.90

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

NSC’s P/B Ratio of 3.90 is in the upper tier for the Ground Transportation industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PWR

7.13

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NSC vs. PWR: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Ground Transportation and Construction & Engineering industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNSCPWR
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)19.1857.10
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.282.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.907.13
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.7440.85