Seek Returns logo

NOV vs. TS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NOV and TS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NOV is a standard domestic listing, while TS trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolNOVTS
Company NameNOV Inc.Tenaris S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryEnergy Equipment & ServicesEnergy Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization5.09 billion USD19.50 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateOctober 29, 1996December 16, 2002
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NOV and TS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NOV vs. TS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNOVTS
5-Day Price Return3.40%2.14%
13-Week Price Return4.74%-5.02%
26-Week Price Return-9.99%-14.39%
52-Week Price Return-15.01%5.51%
Month-to-Date Return3.40%2.04%
Year-to-Date Return-6.16%-14.22%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.72M2.47M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.89M2.15M
3-Month Volatility38.51%23.39%
Beta0.980.72

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NOV

7.31%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

NOV’s Return on Equity of 7.31% is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

TS

11.86%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
35.03%
Q3
19.11%
Median
12.78%
Q1
7.55%
Min
-1.07%

TS’s Return on Equity of 11.86% is on par with the norm for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NOV

5.36%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

NOV’s Net Profit Margin of 5.36% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TS

17.02%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
17.17%
Q3
9.96%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.84%
Min
-0.90%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.02% places TS in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NOV

7.92%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

NOV’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.92% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TS

18.93%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
31.93%
Q3
18.93%
Median
11.31%
Q1
4.98%
Min
0.83%

TS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.93% is around the midpoint for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNOVTS
Return on Equity (TTM)7.31%11.86%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.15%9.70%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)5.36%17.02%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)7.92%18.93%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)21.37%33.79%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NOV

2.58

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

NOV’s Current Ratio of 2.58 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TS

3.41

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
3.41
Q3
2.08
Median
1.38
Q1
1.10
Min
0.68

TS’s Current Ratio of 3.41 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NOV

0.31

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, NOV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TS

0.03

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.06
Q3
1.10
Median
0.48
Q1
0.34
Min
0.02

Falling into the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NOV

49.88

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

NOV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 49.88 is in the upper quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TS

101.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
49.88
Q3
26.65
Median
7.66
Q1
2.15
Min
-17.36

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 101.80, TS demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNOVTS
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.583.41
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.622.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.03
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)49.88101.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

NOV vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NOV vs. TS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NOV

3.79%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

NOV’s Dividend Yield of 3.79% is consistent with its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TS

4.61%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
8.36%
Q3
4.38%
Median
2.41%
Q1
0.32%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 4.61%, TS offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Energy Equipment & Services industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NOV

40.98%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

NOV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.98% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TS

85.87%

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
169.85%
Q3
94.25%
Median
39.49%
Q1
15.00%
Min
0.00%

TS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 85.87% is within the typical range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNOVTS
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.79%4.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.98%85.87%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NOV

10.80

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, NOV’s P/E Ratio of 10.80 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TS

9.74

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
22.89
Q3
18.22
Median
13.03
Q1
11.98
Min
7.14

In the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry, TS’s P/E Ratio of 9.74 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NOV

0.58

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

NOV’s P/S Ratio of 0.58 aligns with the market consensus for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TS

1.66

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
2.84
Q3
1.60
Median
0.87
Q1
0.54
Min
0.23

TS’s P/S Ratio of 1.66 is in the upper echelon for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NOV

0.72

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

NOV’s P/B Ratio of 0.72 is in the lower quartile for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TS

1.21

Energy Equipment & Services Industry

Max
4.44
Q3
2.60
Median
1.77
Q1
1.17
Min
0.24

TS’s P/B Ratio of 1.21 is within the conventional range for the Energy Equipment & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NOV vs. TS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Energy Equipment & Services industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNOVTS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)10.809.74
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.581.66
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.721.21
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)5.6010.47