Seek Returns logo

NOK vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NOK and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NOK trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, UBER is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolNOKUBER
Company NameNokia OyjUber Technologies, Inc.
CountryFinlandUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustryCommunications EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization37.35 billion USD191.69 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 1, 1994May 10, 2019
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NOK and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NOK vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNOKUBER
5-Day Price Return-0.44%-2.64%
13-Week Price Return62.31%-1.06%
26-Week Price Return27.49%-0.11%
52-Week Price Return36.26%28.75%
Month-to-Date Return-0.58%-5.06%
Year-to-Date Return36.39%51.89%
10-Day Avg. Volume11.76M20.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume14.87M17.13M
3-Month Volatility53.93%30.03%
Beta0.931.20

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NOK

4.60%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
31.28%
Q3
24.67%
Median
13.12%
Q1
4.60%
Min
-12.73%

NOK’s Return on Equity of 4.60% is on par with the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

UBER

70.61%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
23.31%
Q3
13.97%
Median
9.07%
Q1
6.97%
Min
1.90%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 70.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NOK

4.70%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
28.72%
Q3
14.02%
Median
5.41%
Q1
2.50%
Min
-13.11%

NOK’s Net Profit Margin of 4.70% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

UBER

33.54%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
33.54%
Q3
16.85%
Median
7.19%
Q1
4.37%
Min
-12.12%

A Net Profit Margin of 33.54% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NOK

6.02%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
33.69%
Q3
15.81%
Median
6.02%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-4.94%

NOK’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.02% is around the midpoint for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

UBER

8.72%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.90%
Q3
24.00%
Median
10.93%
Q1
7.11%
Min
-12.12%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 8.72% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNOKUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)4.60%70.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.47%29.80%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.70%33.54%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.02%8.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.89%34.15%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NOK

1.48

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
3.28
Q3
2.10
Median
1.52
Q1
1.17
Min
0.91

NOK’s Current Ratio of 1.48 aligns with the median group of the Communications Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.15

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.11
Q3
1.32
Median
1.02
Q1
0.74
Min
0.39

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NOK

0.21

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
1.44
Q3
0.96
Median
0.43
Q1
0.21
Min
0.00

NOK’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.21 is typical for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.54
Q3
1.52
Median
0.99
Q1
0.49
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NOK

34.19

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
55.49
Q3
34.19
Median
8.92
Q1
3.73
Min
-9.94

NOK’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 34.19 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
59.80
Q3
25.78
Median
8.23
Q1
2.52
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNOKUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.481.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.231.12
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.210.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)34.19-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

NOK vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NOK vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NOK

2.30%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
2.99%
Q3
2.30%
Median
0.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NOK’s Dividend Yield of 2.30% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.32%
Q3
2.61%
Median
1.59%
Q1
0.75%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NOK

60.69%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
111.16%
Q3
61.16%
Median
30.78%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NOK’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 60.69% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
149.12%
Q3
76.66%
Median
45.70%
Q1
15.53%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNOKUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.30%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)60.69%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NOK

35.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
74.67
Q3
56.42
Median
31.00
Q1
15.93
Min
3.89

NOK’s P/E Ratio of 35.66 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

11.39

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.48
Q3
25.52
Median
16.81
Q1
12.10
Min
5.45

In the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s P/E Ratio of 11.39 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NOK

1.68

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
11.84
Q3
5.68
Median
2.55
Q1
1.24
Min
0.40

NOK’s P/S Ratio of 1.68 aligns with the market consensus for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

3.82

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
3.82
Q3
2.15
Median
1.37
Q1
0.81
Min
0.19

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 3.82 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NOK

1.14

Communications Equipment Industry

Max
6.02
Q3
6.01
Median
3.83
Q1
2.41
Min
0.42

NOK’s P/B Ratio of 1.14 is in the lower quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

UBER

7.26

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.19
Q3
3.11
Median
1.41
Q1
1.18
Min
0.69

At 7.26, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NOK vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNOKUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)35.6611.39
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.683.82
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1.147.26
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.7021.89