NOC vs. XYL: Northrop Grumman vs. Xylem Stock Comparison
How do Northrop Grumman (NOC) and Xylem (XYL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Northrop Grumman (NOC) and Xylem (XYL) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but NOC is classified in Aerospace & Defense while XYL is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Northrop Grumman Corporation | Xylem Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 74.59 billion USD | 22.44 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | December 31, 1981 | October 13, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -3.34% | -33.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 7.23% | 2.29% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 9.98% | -4.47% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Northrop Grumman (NOC) reports a negative beta of -0.12, suggesting inverse market sensitivity over the measurement window. That is uncommon for ordinary equities and can reflect commodity-linked or hedge-like exposure, but it can also come from statistical noise. Xylem (XYL) has a non-negative beta of 0.96.
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 28.86% | 30.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | -0.12 | 0.96 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.80% | -44.89% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 902.47K | 2.60M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | -1.22 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.37 | -1.48 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 26.07% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Xylem (XYL) at 9.76% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for NOC.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
26.07%
- Max
- 40.55%
- NOC
- 26.07%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
9.76%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- XYL
- 9.76%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 10.37% and Xylem (XYL) at 11.94% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
10.37%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- NOC
- 10.37%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
11.94%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- XYL
- 11.94%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 12.91% and Xylem (XYL) at 15.95% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
12.91%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- NOC
- 12.91%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
15.95%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- XYL
- 15.95%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 26.07% | 9.76% |
| ROA (TTM) | 7.11% | 5.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.37% | 11.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.91% | 15.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 20.03% | 39.32% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.24% and Xylem (XYL) at 5.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 2.61% and Xylem (XYL) at 7.40% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.24% | 5.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.65% | 17.84% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 2.61% | 7.40% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.60% | 25.99% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.23 and Xylem (XYL) at 1.39 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.23
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- NOC
- 1.23
- Min
- 0.36
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
1.39
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- XYL
- 1.39
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 0.93 and Xylem (XYL) at 0.29 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
0.93
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- NOC
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
0.29
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- XYL
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.23 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.93 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.87 | 1.18 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.82% and Xylem (XYL) at 1.69% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.82%
- Max
- 2.66%
- NOC
- 1.82%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
1.69%
- Max
- 2.66%
- XYL
- 1.69%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 30.18% and Xylem (XYL) at 37.47% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
30.18%
- Max
- 67.39%
- NOC
- 30.18%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
37.47%
- Max
- 67.39%
- XYL
- 37.47%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.82% | 1.69% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 30.18% | 37.47% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 16.57 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Xylem (XYL) at 21.69 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for NOC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
16.57
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- NOC
- 16.57
- Min
- 3.03
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
21.69
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- XYL
- 21.69
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 1.71 and Xylem (XYL) at 2.48 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
1.71
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- NOC
- 1.71
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
2.48
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- XYL
- 2.48
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Northrop Grumman (NOC) at 3.99 and Xylem (XYL) at 2.19 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
NOC
Capital Goods industry group
3.99
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- NOC
- 3.99
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
XYL
Capital Goods industry group
2.19
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- XYL
- 2.19
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NOC | XYL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 16.57 | 21.69 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.71 | 2.48 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.99 | 2.19 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.21% | 5.39% |