NOC vs. VRT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on November 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at NOC and VRT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	NOC	VRT
Company Name	Northrop Grumman Corporation	Vertiv Holdings Co
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry	Aerospace & Defense	Electrical Equipment
Market Capitalization	80.35 billion USD	71.82 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 31, 1981	August 2, 2018
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NOC and VRT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NOC vs. VRT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	NOC	VRT
5-Day Price Return	-2.45%	3.88%
13-Week Price Return	-2.97%	34.33%
26-Week Price Return	15.83%	96.65%
52-Week Price Return	8.14%	53.75%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.51%	-2.60%
Year-to-Date Return	19.96%	65.34%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.74M	6.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.76M	7.53M
3-Month Volatility	16.83%	51.84%
Beta	0.05	2.07

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NOC

26.04%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 37.11%
Q3: 20.14%
Median: 11.72%
Q1: 6.30%
Min: -6.24%

In the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, NOC’s Return on Equity of 26.04% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

VRT

35.25%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 35.67%
Q3: 23.64%
Median: 11.74%
Q1: 6.08%
Min: -4.39%

In the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, VRT’s Return on Equity of 35.25% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NOC

9.82%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 13.66%
Q3: 8.61%
Median: 6.59%
Q1: 4.92%
Min: 1.01%

A Net Profit Margin of 9.82% places NOC in the upper quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

VRT

10.67%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 20.60%
Q3: 10.26%
Median: 5.83%
Q1: 2.92%
Min: -0.75%

A Net Profit Margin of 10.67% places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NOC

10.58%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 22.35%
Q3: 12.83%
Median: 9.29%
Q1: 6.38%
Min: -2.15%

NOC’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.58% is around the midpoint for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

VRT

14.68%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 26.24%
Q3: 14.53%
Median: 7.97%
Q1: 3.45%
Min: -5.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 14.68% places VRT in the upper quartile for the Electrical Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	NOC	VRT
Return on Equity (TTM)	26.04%	35.25%
Return on Assets (TTM)	8.18%	10.39%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	9.82%	10.67%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	10.58%	14.68%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	19.42%	35.72%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NOC

1.11

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 3.35
Q3: 2.03
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.04
Min: 0.77

NOC’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

VRT

1.83

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.31
Q3: 2.09
Median: 1.48
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.85

VRT’s Current Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the median group of the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NOC

0.98

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 0.96
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.37
Min: 0.03

NOC’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Aerospace & Defense industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.98. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

VRT

0.83

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 1.57
Q3: 0.96
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

VRT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.83 is typical for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NOC

9.08

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 36.57
Q3: 19.08
Median: 7.25
Q1: 2.65
Min: -7.63

NOC’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Aerospace & Defense industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

VRT

2.36

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 44.15
Q3: 19.29
Median: 9.38
Q1: 0.98
Min: -19.47

VRT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Electrical Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	NOC	VRT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.11	1.83
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.88	1.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.98	0.83
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	9.08	2.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

NOC vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NOC vs. VRT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NOC

1.56%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 2.72%
Q3: 1.45%
Median: 0.48%
Q1: 0.08%
Min: 0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 1.56%, NOC offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Aerospace & Defense industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

VRT

0.08%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 3.04%
Q3: 1.58%
Median: 1.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Yield of 0.08% is consistent with its peers in the Electrical Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NOC

31.43%

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 110.40%
Q3: 50.43%
Median: 17.11%
Q1: 0.46%
Min: 0.00%

NOC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.43% is within the typical range for the Aerospace & Defense industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

VRT

5.48%

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 165.68%
Q3: 71.84%
Median: 38.15%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

VRT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.48% is within the typical range for the Electrical Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	NOC	VRT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.56%	0.08%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	31.43%	5.48%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NOC

20.19

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 67.20
Q3: 55.74
Median: 33.28
Q1: 27.49
Min: 15.02

In the lower quartile for the Aerospace & Defense industry, NOC’s P/E Ratio of 20.19 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

VRT

67.66

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 65.02
Q3: 38.99
Median: 27.41
Q1: 19.88
Min: 8.37

At 67.66, VRT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Electrical Equipment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NOC

1.98

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 9.06
Q3: 4.87
Median: 2.47
Q1: 1.61
Min: 0.33

NOC’s P/S Ratio of 1.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

VRT

7.22

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 7.01
Q3: 4.03
Median: 1.79
Q1: 1.10
Min: 0.47

With a P/S Ratio of 7.22, VRT trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Electrical Equipment industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NOC

5.46

Aerospace & Defense Industry

Max: 14.90
Q3: 8.93
Median: 4.70
Q1: 3.03
Min: 0.83

NOC’s P/B Ratio of 5.46 is within the conventional range for the Aerospace & Defense industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

VRT

16.42

Electrical Equipment Industry

Max: 10.97
Q3: 5.57
Median: 3.50
Q1: 1.66
Min: 0.64

At 16.42, VRT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Electrical Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NOC vs. VRT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Aerospace & Defense and Electrical Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	NOC	VRT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	20.19	67.66
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.98	7.22
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	5.46	16.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	22.20	51.25