Seek Returns

NMR vs. SEIC: Nomura vs. SEI Investments Stock Comparison

How do Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while SEIC falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.

SEI Investments (SEIC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Company profile comparison for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
Profile ItemNMRSEIC
NameNomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADRSEI Investments Company
Country/RegionJapanUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS Industry GroupFinancial ServicesFinancial Services
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsCapital Markets
GICS Sub-IndustryInvestment Banking & BrokerageAsset Management & Custody Banks
Market Capitalization27.53 billion USD12.49 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateDecember 17, 2001March 25, 1981
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

NMR
SEIC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Total Return (1Y)35.42%32.47%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)37.86%26.31%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.78%12.52%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

NMR
SEIC
GSPC
Loading price history…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)29.52%23.86%
Beta (5Y)0.790.94
Max Drawdown (5Y)-38.40%-26.00%
Avg. Volume (3M)789.26K756.15K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
NMR and SEIC are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.061.18
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.551.85

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

SEI Investments (SEIC) at 27.26% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for SEIC.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

11.51%

Max
44.78%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
NMR
11.51%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

27.26%

Max
44.78%
SEIC
27.26%
Q3
21.85%
Median
12.91%
Q1
4.48%
Min
-18.71%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their ROE against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

SEI Investments (SEIC) at 28.06% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

17.12%

Max
62.84%
Q3
28.05%
NMR
17.12%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

28.06%

Max
62.84%
SEIC
28.06%
Q3
28.05%
Median
15.36%
Q1
4.82%
Min
-28.52%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their net margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 29.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

24.36%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
NMR
24.36%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

29.91%

Max
107.33%
Q3
55.90%
Median
30.09%
SEIC
29.91%
Q1
14.60%
Min
-44.34%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their operating margin against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
ROE (TTM)11.51%27.26%
ROA (TTM)0.68%14.74%
Net Margin (TTM)17.12%28.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.36%29.91%
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 8.10% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 27.66% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Revenue Growth (YoY)10.80%8.10%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)17.17%4.89%
EPS Growth (YoY)7.17%27.66%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)58.75%17.62%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and SEI Investments (SEIC) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and SEI Investments (SEIC) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Current Ratio (MRQ)----
Debt / Equity (MRQ)----
Net Debt / EBITDA----

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

SEI Investments (SEIC) at 0.99% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

620.40%

NMR
620.40%
Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

0.99%

Max
9.77%
Q3
3.92%
Median
1.09%
SEIC
0.99%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 18.09% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

16.85%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
NMR
16.85%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

18.09%

Max
241.07%
Q3
97.36%
Median
25.77%
SEIC
18.09%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
Dividend Yield (TTM)620.40%0.99%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)16.85%18.09%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 18.31 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

10.83

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
Median
15.37
NMR
10.83
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

18.31

Max
45.85
Q3
24.64
SEIC
18.31
Median
15.37
Q1
9.68
Min
0.16
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while SEI Investments (SEIC) at 4.93 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

0.01

Max
9.23
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
NMR
0.01
Min
-0.55

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

4.93

Max
9.23
SEIC
4.93
Q3
4.57
Median
2.72
Q1
1.28
Min
-0.55
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while SEI Investments (SEIC) at 4.98 carries an above-peer premium to book — SEIC is pricier on assets.

NMR

Financial Services industry group

1.15

Max
7.79
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
NMR
1.15
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39

SEIC

Financial Services industry group

4.98

Max
7.79
SEIC
4.98
Q3
3.63
Median
1.57
Q1
0.81
Min
-0.39
Loading chart…
Nomura (NMR) vs. SEI Investments (SEIC): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Financial Services industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC)
MetricNMRSEIC
P/E Ratio (TTM)10.8318.31
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.014.93
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.154.98
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----