NMR vs. SEIC: Nomura vs. SEI Investments Stock Comparison
How do Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Nomura (NMR) and SEI Investments (SEIC) both belong to the Capital Markets industry, though NMR is classified under Investment Banking & Brokerage while SEIC falls under Asset Management & Custody Banks.
SEI Investments (SEIC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR | SEI Investments Company |
| Country/Region | Japan | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Capital Markets | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Investment Banking & Brokerage | Asset Management & Custody Banks |
| Market Capitalization | 27.53 billion USD | 12.49 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | December 17, 2001 | March 25, 1981 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 35.42% | 32.47% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 37.86% | 26.31% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.78% | 12.52% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 29.52% | 23.86% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.79 | 0.94 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -38.40% | -26.00% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 789.26K | 756.15K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.06 | 1.18 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.55 | 1.85 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
SEI Investments (SEIC) at 27.26% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for SEIC.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
27.26%
- Max
- 44.78%
- SEIC
- 27.26%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
SEI Investments (SEIC) at 28.06% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Nomura (NMR) at 17.12%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
28.06%
- Max
- 62.84%
- SEIC
- 28.06%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 29.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
29.91%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- SEIC
- 29.91%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 11.51% | 27.26% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.68% | 14.74% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.12% | 28.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.36% | 29.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 8.10% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 27.66% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.80% | 8.10% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 17.17% | 4.89% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 7.17% | 27.66% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 58.75% | 17.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and SEI Investments (SEIC) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services and SEI Investments (SEIC) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
SEI Investments (SEIC) at 0.99% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- SEIC
- 0.99%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 18.09% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
18.09%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- SEIC
- 18.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 620.40% | 0.99% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 16.85% | 18.09% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 and SEI Investments (SEIC) at 18.31 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
18.31
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- SEIC
- 18.31
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while SEI Investments (SEIC) at 4.93 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
4.93
- Max
- 9.23
- SEIC
- 4.93
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while SEI Investments (SEIC) at 4.98 carries an above-peer premium to book — SEIC is pricier on assets.
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
SEIC
Financial Services industry group
4.98
- Max
- 7.79
- SEIC
- 4.98
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | NMR | SEIC |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.83 | 18.31 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.01 | 4.93 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.15 | 4.98 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |