NMR vs. RKT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 24, 2025

Here’s a clear look at NMR and RKT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NMR trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, RKT is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	NMR	RKT
Company Name	Nomura Holdings, Inc.	Rocket Companies, Inc.
Country	Japan	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Capital Markets	Financial Services
Market Capitalization	21.30 billion USD	37.49 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	December 17, 2001	August 6, 2020
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NMR and RKT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NMR vs. RKT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	NMR	RKT
5-Day Price Return	1.08%	-5.13%
13-Week Price Return	25.44%	37.14%
26-Week Price Return	3.96%	38.10%
52-Week Price Return	23.08%	-7.45%
Month-to-Date Return	7.16%	20.24%
Year-to-Date Return	15.64%	57.73%
10-Day Avg. Volume	10.71M	16.97M
3-Month Avg. Volume	12.60M	15.96M
3-Month Volatility	20.12%	58.40%
Beta	1.48	2.23

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NMR

9.87%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

NMR’s Return on Equity of 9.87% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 40.58%
Q3: 20.06%
Median: 10.67%
Q1: 4.19%
Min: -10.31%

RKT has a negative Return on Equity of -0.01%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NMR

7.19%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s Net Profit Margin of 7.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

RKT

-0.01%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 52.86%
Q3: 25.58%
Median: 12.23%
Q1: 6.64%
Min: -9.92%

RKT has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.01%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NMR

9.96%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

NMR’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.96% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

RKT

13.77%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 77.28%
Q3: 37.68%
Median: 18.17%
Q1: 9.27%
Min: -8.19%

RKT’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.77% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	NMR	RKT
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.87%	-0.01%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.58%	0.00%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	7.19%	-0.01%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	9.96%	13.77%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	39.95%	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NMR

0.23

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

RKT

0.40

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.58
Q3: 2.59
Median: 1.33
Q1: 0.69
Min: 0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NMR

10.44

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.69

Financial Services Industry

Max: 4.96
Q3: 2.10
Median: 0.57
Q1: 0.12
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NMR

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

RKT

2.42

Financial Services Industry

Max: 136.23
Q3: 56.08
Median: 6.55
Q1: 2.01
Min: -33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	NMR	RKT
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.23	0.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.23	0.40
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	10.44	2.69
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	2.42

Growth

Revenue Growth

NMR vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NMR vs. RKT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NMR

3.55%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Yield of 3.55% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 8.18%
Q3: 3.60%
Median: 1.56%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NMR

66.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

NMR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 66.06% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

RKT

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max: 155.56%
Q3: 63.71%
Median: 18.08%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

RKT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	NMR	RKT
Dividend Yield (TTM)	3.55%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	66.06%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NMR

9.31

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/E Ratio of 9.31 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RKT

Financial Services Industry

Max: 63.23
Q3: 32.10
Median: 14.41
Q1: 10.81
Min: 0.37

P/E Ratio data for RKT is currently unavailable.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NMR

0.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, NMR’s P/S Ratio of 0.67 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RKT

7.31

Financial Services Industry

Max: 11.16
Q3: 5.45
Median: 2.61
Q1: 1.25
Min: 0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NMR

0.83

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

NMR’s P/B Ratio of 0.83 is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

RKT

3.81

Financial Services Industry

Max: 7.09
Q3: 3.79
Median: 1.46
Q1: 0.83
Min: 0.04

RKT’s P/B Ratio of 3.81 is in the upper tier for the Financial Services industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NMR vs. RKT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	NMR	RKT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	9.31	--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	0.67	7.31
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	0.83	3.81
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	3.32	20.65