Seek Returns logo

NIO vs. XPEV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NIO and XPEV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both NIO and XPEV are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

SymbolNIOXPEV
Company NameNIO Inc.XPeng Inc.
CountryChinaChina
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryAutomobilesAutomobiles
Market Capitalization13.30 billion USD18.41 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateSeptember 12, 2018August 27, 2020
Security TypeADRADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NIO and XPEV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NIO vs. XPEV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNIOXPEV
5-Day Price Return30.18%5.11%
13-Week Price Return60.91%1.95%
26-Week Price Return45.41%27.71%
52-Week Price Return58.90%182.92%
Month-to-Date Return30.18%11.86%
Year-to-Date Return45.41%72.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume85.65M9.22M
3-Month Avg. Volume49.98M7.30M
3-Month Volatility66.68%53.41%
Beta1.282.53

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NIO

-167.90%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

NIO has a negative Return on Equity of -167.90%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

XPEV

-15.89%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

XPEV has a negative Return on Equity of -15.89%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NIO

-35.80%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

NIO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.80%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

XPEV

-10.15%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

XPEV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -10.15%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NIO

-33.76%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

NIO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -33.76%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

XPEV

-12.08%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

XPEV has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -12.08%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNIOXPEV
Return on Equity (TTM)-167.90%-15.89%
Return on Assets (TTM)-23.68%-6.30%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-35.80%-10.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-33.76%-12.08%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)10.20%16.38%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

0.84

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

NIO’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

XPEV

1.21

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

XPEV’s Current Ratio of 1.21 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

3.46

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.46, NIO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

XPEV

0.42

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

XPEV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NIO

-49.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

NIO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -49.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

XPEV

-19.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

XPEV has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -19.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNIOXPEV
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.841.21
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.611.00
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)3.460.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-49.07-19.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

NIO vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NIO vs. XPEV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NIO

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NIO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

XPEV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NIO

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

NIO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

XPEV

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

XPEV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNIOXPEV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NIO

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for NIO is currently unavailable.

XPEV

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for XPEV is currently unavailable.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NIO

1.01

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

NIO’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

XPEV

2.45

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.45, XPEV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

10.95

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 10.95, NIO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

XPEV

4.61

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

At 4.61, XPEV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NIO vs. XPEV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNIOXPEV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.012.45
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.954.61
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)----