NIO vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 27, 2025

Here’s a clear look at NIO and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both NIO and TM are American Depositary Receipts (ADRs). This provides U.S. investors with straightforward access to investing in these foreign-listed companies.

Symbol	NIO	TM
Company Name	NIO Inc.	Toyota Motor Corporation
Country	China	Japan
GICS Sector	Consumer Discretionary	Consumer Discretionary
GICS Industry	Automobiles	Automobiles
Market Capitalization	15.14 billion USD	260.22 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	September 12, 2018	March 17, 1980
Security Type	ADR	ADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NIO and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NIO vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	NIO	TM
5-Day Price Return	20.12%	1.38%
13-Week Price Return	56.96%	12.33%
26-Week Price Return	38.72%	4.16%
52-Week Price Return	52.63%	14.38%
Month-to-Date Return	25.05%	9.14%
Year-to-Date Return	39.68%	-6.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume	97.68M	27.75M
3-Month Avg. Volume	51.40M	28.99M
3-Month Volatility	67.29%	36.70%
Beta	1.26	1.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NIO

-167.90%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

NIO has a negative Return on Equity of -167.90%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 25.70%
Q3: 12.88%
Median: 6.92%
Q1: 0.71%
Min: -15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NIO

-35.80%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

NIO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -35.80%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 9.92%
Q3: 5.78%
Median: 3.23%
Q1: 0.11%
Min: -5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NIO

-33.76%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

NIO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -33.76%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 13.07%
Q3: 7.22%
Median: 5.29%
Q1: 0.43%
Min: -4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	NIO	TM
Return on Equity (TTM)	-167.90%	12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)	-23.68%	4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	-35.80%	8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	-33.76%	9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	10.20%	19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

0.84

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

NIO’s Current Ratio of 0.84 falls into the lower quartile for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.19
Q3: 1.54
Median: 1.26
Q1: 1.09
Min: 0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

3.46

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.46, NIO operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Automobiles industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max: 2.34
Q3: 1.13
Median: 0.58
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NIO

-49.07

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

NIO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -49.07. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TM

Automobiles Industry

Max: 77.87
Q3: 42.86
Median: 13.88
Q1: 2.13
Min: -49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	NIO	TM
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.84	1.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	0.61	1.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.46	1.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	-49.07	--

Growth

Revenue Growth

NIO vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NIO vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NIO

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

NIO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TM

3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 10.71%
Q3: 5.39%
Median: 3.14%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NIO

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

NIO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max: 114.43%
Q3: 59.30%
Median: 37.15%
Q1: 16.40%
Min: 0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	NIO	TM
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NIO

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

P/E Ratio data for NIO is currently unavailable.

TM

8.93

Automobiles Industry

Max: 27.69
Q3: 19.99
Median: 9.85
Q1: 6.60
Min: 4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NIO

1.01

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

NIO’s P/S Ratio of 1.01 is in the upper echelon for the Automobiles industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TM

0.79

Automobiles Industry

Max: 1.52
Q3: 0.84
Median: 0.41
Q1: 0.23
Min: 0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NIO

10.95

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

At 10.95, NIO’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Automobiles industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max: 4.25
Q3: 2.00
Median: 0.87
Q1: 0.46
Min: 0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NIO vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Automobiles industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	NIO	TM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	--	8.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.01	0.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	10.95	1.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	--	52.42