Seek Returns logo

NICE vs. TEAM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NICE and TEAM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NICE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TEAM is a standard domestic listing.

SymbolNICETEAM
Company NameNICE Ltd.Atlassian Corporation
CountryIsraelAustralia
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySoftwareSoftware
Market Capitalization9.08 billion USD39.48 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 25, 1996December 9, 2015
Security TypeADRCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NICE and TEAM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NICE vs. TEAM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNICETEAM
5-Day Price Return-3.82%-8.97%
13-Week Price Return-12.81%-29.52%
26-Week Price Return-14.39%-29.08%
52-Week Price Return9.98%-6.08%
Month-to-Date Return5.97%-5.77%
Year-to-Date Return-21.44%-38.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.17M2.81M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.15M2.49M
3-Month Volatility33.43%44.96%
Beta-0.330.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NICE

14.85%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

NICE’s Return on Equity of 14.85% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-20.69%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

TEAM has a negative Return on Equity of -20.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NICE

18.81%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

NICE’s Net Profit Margin of 18.81% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Software industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-4.92%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

TEAM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -4.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NICE

21.25%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

NICE’s Operating Profit Margin of 21.25% is around the midpoint for the Software industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TEAM

-2.50%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

TEAM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -2.50%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNICETEAM
Return on Equity (TTM)14.85%-20.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)10.16%-4.59%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.81%-4.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)21.25%-2.50%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)67.03%82.84%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NICE

1.83

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

NICE’s Current Ratio of 1.83 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TEAM

1.22

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

TEAM’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NICE

0.12

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

NICE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TEAM

0.73

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

TEAM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NICE

37.69

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

NICE’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 37.69 is in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

TEAM

-11.02

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

TEAM has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -11.02. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNICETEAM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.831.22
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.671.17
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)37.69-11.02

Growth

Revenue Growth

NICE vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NICE vs. TEAM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NICE

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NICE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NICE

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NICE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TEAM

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TEAM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNICETEAM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NICE

17.06

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, NICE’s P/E Ratio of 17.06 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TEAM

--

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

P/E Ratio data for TEAM is currently unavailable.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NICE

3.21

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

In the lower quartile for the Software industry, NICE’s P/S Ratio of 3.21 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TEAM

7.57

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

TEAM’s P/S Ratio of 7.57 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Software industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NICE

2.92

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

NICE’s P/B Ratio of 2.92 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

TEAM

39.62

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

At 39.62, TEAM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Software industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NICE vs. TEAM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Software industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNICETEAM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)17.06--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.217.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.9239.62
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.8027.89