Seek Returns logo

NFLX vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NFLX and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNFLXUBER
Company NameNetflix, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorCommunication ServicesIndustrials
GICS IndustryEntertainmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization511.89 billion USD195.47 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMay 23, 2002May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NFLX and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NFLX vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNFLXUBER
5-Day Price Return-3.25%2.55%
13-Week Price Return0.84%1.37%
26-Week Price Return16.30%16.74%
52-Week Price Return72.80%26.35%
Month-to-Date Return3.90%6.81%
Year-to-Date Return35.15%55.39%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.76M18.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.71M20.55M
3-Month Volatility25.00%29.59%
Beta1.611.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NFLX

42.50%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

In the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, NFLX’s Return on Equity of 42.50% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NFLX

24.58%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

A Net Profit Margin of 24.58% places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NFLX

29.51%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

An Operating Profit Margin of 29.51% places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNFLXUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)42.50%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.42%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)24.58%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)29.51%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)48.49%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NFLX

1.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

NFLX’s Current Ratio of 1.34 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NFLX

0.58

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

NFLX’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NFLX

23.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

NFLX’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 23.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNFLXUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.341.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.340.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.580.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)23.05-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

NFLX vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NFLX vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NFLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NFLX currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NFLX

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NFLX has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNFLXUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NFLX

49.96

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

A P/E Ratio of 49.96 places NFLX in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NFLX

12.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

NFLX’s P/S Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NFLX

22.84

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 22.84, NFLX’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

NFLX vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Entertainment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNFLXUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)49.9615.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.284.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)22.848.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)60.2322.90