Seek Returns logo

NET vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NET and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNETTTWO
Company NameCloudflare, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustryIT ServicesEntertainment
Market Capitalization72.58 billion USD43.44 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateSeptember 13, 2019April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NET and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NET vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNETTTWO
5-Day Price Return-12.44%0.41%
13-Week Price Return4.82%1.23%
26-Week Price Return40.06%3.92%
52-Week Price Return123.66%29.23%
Month-to-Date Return-16.86%-8.32%
Year-to-Date Return95.58%27.68%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.01M2.43M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.68M1.71M
3-Month Volatility46.50%26.19%
Beta2.000.95

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NET

-8.16%

IT Services Industry

Max
37.08%
Q3
19.28%
Median
14.70%
Q1
6.70%
Min
-8.16%

NET has a negative Return on Equity of -8.16%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

TTWO

-108.38%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.86%
Q3
22.17%
Median
13.67%
Q1
4.55%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -108.38%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NET

-5.13%

IT Services Industry

Max
17.01%
Q3
11.02%
Median
6.91%
Q1
3.07%
Min
-5.13%

NET has a negative Net Profit Margin of -5.13%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

TTWO

-64.26%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
29.05%
Median
15.14%
Q1
4.44%
Min
-21.70%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -64.26%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NET

-9.58%

IT Services Industry

Max
23.01%
Q3
15.32%
Median
9.57%
Q1
4.91%
Min
-9.58%

NET has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -9.58%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

TTWO

-64.10%

Entertainment Industry

Max
43.42%
Q3
28.90%
Median
18.77%
Q1
9.11%
Min
-4.88%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -64.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNETTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)-8.16%-108.38%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.25%-38.41%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-5.13%-64.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-9.58%-64.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)75.20%56.70%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NET

2.04

IT Services Industry

Max
3.02
Q3
1.91
Median
1.36
Q1
1.02
Min
0.49

NET’s Current Ratio of 2.04 is in the upper quartile for the IT Services industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TTWO

1.15

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.06
Median
1.58
Q1
0.87
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.15 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NET

2.42

IT Services Industry

Max
2.55
Q3
1.30
Median
0.55
Q1
0.14
Min
0.00

NET’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the IT Services industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.42. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

TTWO

0.89

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.80
Median
0.15
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NET

-4.24

IT Services Industry

Max
129.00
Q3
56.00
Median
11.69
Q1
1.68
Min
-28.15

NET has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNETTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.041.15
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.991.05
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.420.89
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.24-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

NET vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NET vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NET

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
4.66%
Q3
2.02%
Median
0.66%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NET currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.71%
Q3
1.23%
Median
0.60%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NET

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
93.78%
Q3
63.22%
Median
24.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NET has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
37.50%
Median
24.18%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNETTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NET

--

IT Services Industry

Max
45.03
Q3
30.25
Median
21.01
Q1
16.50
Min
0.00

P/E Ratio data for NET is currently unavailable.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
80.06
Q3
53.00
Median
28.44
Q1
18.00
Min
2.61

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NET

35.26

IT Services Industry

Max
5.24
Q3
4.01
Median
2.18
Q1
1.08
Min
0.00

With a P/S Ratio of 35.26, NET trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

TTWO

6.98

Entertainment Industry

Max
10.86
Q3
6.98
Median
4.25
Q1
2.56
Min
0.51

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NET

55.52

IT Services Industry

Max
9.42
Q3
5.79
Median
3.70
Q1
2.30
Min
0.79

At 55.52, NET’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the IT Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

TTWO

13.89

Entertainment Industry

Max
19.63
Q3
10.35
Median
5.18
Q1
2.07
Min
0.59

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 13.89 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NET vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNETTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)35.266.98
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)55.5213.89
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)341.33135.12