Seek Returns logo

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NDAQ and PYPL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNDAQPYPL
Company NameNasdaq, Inc.PayPal Holdings, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsFinancials
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsFinancial Services
Market Capitalization54.84 billion USD67.48 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 1, 2002July 6, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NDAQ and PYPL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNDAQPYPL
5-Day Price Return-0.91%3.53%
13-Week Price Return18.35%-2.32%
26-Week Price Return14.10%-10.11%
52-Week Price Return40.59%11.30%
Month-to-Date Return-0.68%2.72%
Year-to-Date Return23.62%-17.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume2.97M11.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume3.66M10.91M
3-Month Volatility17.83%33.26%
Beta1.031.45

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NDAQ

13.22%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

NDAQ’s Return on Equity of 13.22% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PYPL

23.09%

Financial Services Industry

Max
40.58%
Q3
20.06%
Median
10.67%
Q1
4.19%
Min
-10.31%

In the upper quartile for the Financial Services industry, PYPL’s Return on Equity of 23.09% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NDAQ

18.59%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

NDAQ’s Net Profit Margin of 18.59% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

PYPL

14.49%

Financial Services Industry

Max
52.86%
Q3
25.58%
Median
12.23%
Q1
6.64%
Min
-9.92%

PYPL’s Net Profit Margin of 14.49% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Financial Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NDAQ

26.12%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

NDAQ’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.12% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PYPL

18.17%

Financial Services Industry

Max
77.28%
Q3
37.68%
Median
18.17%
Q1
9.27%
Min
-8.19%

PYPL’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.17% is around the midpoint for the Financial Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNDAQPYPL
Return on Equity (TTM)13.22%23.09%
Return on Assets (TTM)4.94%5.74%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.59%14.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.12%18.17%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)60.60%41.68%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NDAQ

0.96

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

PYPL

1.33

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.58
Q3
2.59
Median
1.33
Q1
0.69
Min
0.01

For the Financial Services industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NDAQ

0.78

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

PYPL

0.56

Financial Services Industry

Max
4.96
Q3
2.10
Median
0.57
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Financial Services industry.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NDAQ

4.92

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

PYPL

1,066.80

Financial Services Industry

Max
136.23
Q3
56.08
Median
6.55
Q1
2.01
Min
-33.27

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Financial Services industry.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNDAQPYPL
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.961.33
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.961.28
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.780.56
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.921,066.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NDAQ

1.04%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

NDAQ’s Dividend Yield of 1.04% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
8.18%
Q3
3.60%
Median
1.56%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NDAQ

37.73%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

NDAQ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 37.73% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

PYPL

0.00%

Financial Services Industry

Max
155.56%
Q3
63.71%
Median
18.08%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PYPL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNDAQPYPL
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.04%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)37.73%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NDAQ

36.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

A P/E Ratio of 36.25 places NDAQ in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

PYPL

14.35

Financial Services Industry

Max
63.23
Q3
32.10
Median
14.41
Q1
10.81
Min
0.37

PYPL’s P/E Ratio of 14.35 is within the middle range for the Financial Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NDAQ

6.74

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

NDAQ’s P/S Ratio of 6.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PYPL

2.08

Financial Services Industry

Max
11.16
Q3
5.45
Median
2.61
Q1
1.25
Min
0.04

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Financial Services industry.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NDAQ

4.35

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

NDAQ’s P/B Ratio of 4.35 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

PYPL

3.58

Financial Services Industry

Max
7.09
Q3
3.79
Median
1.46
Q1
0.83
Min
0.04

PYPL’s P/B Ratio of 3.58 is within the conventional range for the Financial Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NDAQ vs. PYPL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Financial Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNDAQPYPL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)36.2514.35
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.742.08
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.353.58
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)25.6112.69