Seek Returns logo

NCLH vs. SE: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NCLH and SE, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

NCLH is a standard domestic listing, while SE trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolNCLHSE
Company NameNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.Sea Limited
CountryUnited StatesSingapore
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryCommunication Services
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureEntertainment
Market Capitalization11.40 billion USD109.28 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJanuary 18, 2013October 20, 2017
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NCLH and SE by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NCLH vs. SE: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNCLHSE
5-Day Price Return-2.38%-3.82%
13-Week Price Return21.45%11.75%
26-Week Price Return21.81%38.26%
52-Week Price Return17.57%89.51%
Month-to-Date Return-0.85%-4.19%
Year-to-Date Return-4.28%68.45%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.74M3.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.04M4.10M
3-Month Volatility40.39%51.29%
Beta2.231.57

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NCLH

51.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
84.03%
Q3
40.12%
Median
17.38%
Q1
7.45%
Min
-33.94%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s Return on Equity of 51.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

SE

13.69%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

SE’s Return on Equity of 13.69% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NCLH

7.52%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
25.61%
Q3
14.65%
Median
8.66%
Q1
3.36%
Min
-9.83%

NCLH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SE

6.17%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

SE’s Net Profit Margin of 6.17% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Entertainment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NCLH

14.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
45.80%
Q3
22.44%
Median
14.98%
Q1
6.59%
Min
-15.28%

NCLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.77% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SE

7.63%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

SE’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.63% is in the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNCLHSE
Return on Equity (TTM)51.86%13.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.48%5.11%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.52%6.17%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.77%7.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.35%44.96%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

0.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.73
Q3
1.63
Median
1.12
Q1
0.73
Min
0.18

NCLH’s Current Ratio of 0.18 falls into the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SE

1.55

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

SE’s Current Ratio of 1.55 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

8.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
11.29
Q3
4.71
Median
1.65
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

NCLH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.77. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

SE

0.65

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

SE’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

2.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
21.72
Q3
11.40
Median
4.02
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

NCLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SE

-6.05

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

SE has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -6.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNCLHSE
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.181.55
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.071.39
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.770.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.16-6.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

NCLH vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NCLH vs. SE: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
6.81%
Q3
2.73%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
128.39%
Q3
61.60%
Median
21.91%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SE

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SE has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNCLHSE
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

15.30

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
56.96
Q3
33.82
Median
21.30
Q1
15.75
Min
6.06

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/E Ratio of 15.30 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SE

88.53

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

A P/E Ratio of 88.53 places SE in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

1.15

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.19
Q3
3.99
Median
1.93
Q1
1.26
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/S Ratio of 1.15 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SE

5.46

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

SE’s P/S Ratio of 5.46 aligns with the market consensus for the Entertainment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

5.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
24.89
Q3
11.60
Median
4.91
Q1
2.29
Min
0.37

NCLH’s P/B Ratio of 5.77 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SE

9.79

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

SE’s P/B Ratio of 9.79 is within the conventional range for the Entertainment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

NCLH vs. SE: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNCLHSE
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.3088.53
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.155.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.779.79
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.4932.29