Seek Returns logo

NCLH vs. RIVN: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at NCLH and RIVN, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolNCLHRIVN
Company NameNorwegian Cruise Line Holdings Ltd.Rivian Automotive, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorConsumer DiscretionaryConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryHotels, Restaurants & LeisureAutomobiles
Market Capitalization10.78 billion USD14.65 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateJanuary 18, 2013November 10, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of NCLH and RIVN by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

NCLH vs. RIVN: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolNCLHRIVN
5-Day Price Return-2.09%0.08%
13-Week Price Return26.12%-25.91%
26-Week Price Return-9.42%-9.25%
52-Week Price Return47.77%-10.79%
Month-to-Date Return-6.69%-6.22%
Year-to-Date Return-7.31%-9.25%
10-Day Avg. Volume12.53M38.61M
3-Month Avg. Volume15.03M33.11M
3-Month Volatility43.86%38.39%
Beta2.241.84

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

NCLH

51.86%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
83.01%
Q3
39.51%
Median
17.38%
Q1
5.32%
Min
-45.92%

In the upper quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s Return on Equity of 51.86% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

RIVN

-56.67%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

RIVN has a negative Return on Equity of -56.67%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

NCLH

7.52%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.45%
Q3
14.67%
Median
8.69%
Q1
3.34%
Min
-11.30%

NCLH’s Net Profit Margin of 7.52% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-68.06%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

RIVN has a negative Net Profit Margin of -68.06%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

NCLH

14.77%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
38.76%
Q3
21.15%
Median
14.20%
Q1
6.43%
Min
-14.56%

NCLH’s Operating Profit Margin of 14.77% is around the midpoint for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

RIVN

-72.04%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

RIVN has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.04%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolNCLHRIVN
Return on Equity (TTM)51.86%-56.67%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.48%-23.08%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)7.52%-68.06%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)14.77%-72.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)41.35%-4.91%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

0.18

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
2.68
Q3
1.62
Median
1.11
Q1
0.74
Min
0.19

NCLH’s Current Ratio of 0.18 is notably low, falling beneath the typical range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This suggests a heightened liquidity risk and could indicate potential challenges in meeting its short-term obligations.

RIVN

3.44

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

RIVN’s Current Ratio of 3.44 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Automobiles industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

8.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
9.88
Q3
4.54
Median
1.52
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

NCLH’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 8.77. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

RIVN

0.73

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

RIVN’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.73 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

2.16

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
26.88
Q3
11.95
Median
3.87
Q1
1.19
Min
-11.84

NCLH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.16 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

RIVN

-179.31

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

RIVN has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -179.31. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolNCLHRIVN
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.183.44
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.072.72
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)8.770.73
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.16-179.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

NCLH vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

NCLH vs. RIVN: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
5.88%
Q3
2.37%
Median
0.68%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

RIVN currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

0.00%

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
127.31%
Q3
56.79%
Median
19.58%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

NCLH has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

RIVN

0.00%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

RIVN has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolNCLHRIVN
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

15.02

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
59.44
Q3
33.98
Median
22.25
Q1
15.53
Min
7.61

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/E Ratio of 15.02 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

RIVN

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

P/E Ratio data for RIVN is currently unavailable.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

NCLH

1.13

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
7.74
Q3
3.88
Median
2.05
Q1
1.19
Min
0.17

In the lower quartile for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry, NCLH’s P/S Ratio of 1.13 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

RIVN

2.84

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

With a P/S Ratio of 2.84, RIVN trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Automobiles industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

NCLH

5.77

Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure Industry

Max
20.90
Q3
9.78
Median
4.29
Q1
2.22
Min
0.47

NCLH’s P/B Ratio of 5.77 is within the conventional range for the Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

RIVN

2.71

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

RIVN’s P/B Ratio of 2.71 is in the upper tier for the Automobiles industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

NCLH vs. RIVN: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Hotels, Restaurants & Leisure and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolNCLHRIVN
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.02--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.132.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.772.71
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)20.11--