MUFG vs. TW: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MUFG and TW, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MUFG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, TW is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	MUFG	TW
Company Name	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.	Tradeweb Markets Inc.
Country	Japan	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	171.26 billion USD	28.55 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	April 2, 2001	April 4, 2019
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MUFG and TW by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MUFG vs. TW: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	TW
5-Day Price Return	7.05%	-5.51%
13-Week Price Return	16.59%	-7.68%
26-Week Price Return	15.47%	5.88%
52-Week Price Return	71.92%	13.29%
Month-to-Date Return	5.38%	-5.68%
Year-to-Date Return	20.48%	-0.18%
10-Day Avg. Volume	46.54M	1.32M
3-Month Avg. Volume	51.89M	1.24M
3-Month Volatility	23.71%	29.55%
Beta	1.43	0.90

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MUFG

9.14%

Banks Industry

Max: 26.37%
Q3: 15.92%
Median: 12.25%
Q1: 8.69%
Min: 0.15%

MUFG’s Return on Equity of 9.14% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TW

9.49%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 21.61%
Median: 13.77%
Q1: 8.31%
Min: -4.25%

TW’s Return on Equity of 9.49% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MUFG

25.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.70%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.53%
Min: 6.98%

MUFG’s Net Profit Margin of 25.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TW

28.85%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 66.67%
Q3: 35.11%
Median: 23.49%
Q1: 13.63%
Min: -15.18%

TW’s Net Profit Margin of 28.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MUFG

30.87%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.59%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 13.37%

MUFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.87% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TW

38.86%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 86.40%
Q3: 46.46%
Median: 32.80%
Q1: 18.32%
Min: -21.87%

TW’s Operating Profit Margin of 38.86% is around the midpoint for the Capital Markets industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	TW
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.14%	9.49%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.46%	7.44%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	25.66%	28.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	30.87%	38.86%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TW

2.80

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.76
Q3: 1.89
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.54
Min: -0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

4.75

Banks Industry

Max: 4.75
Q3: 2.62
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.39
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

TW

0.00

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.62
Q3: 2.84
Median: 1.02
Q1: 0.32
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

TW

232.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 126.03
Q3: 60.98
Median: 11.77
Q1: 4.95
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	TW
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	2.80
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	2.80
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	4.75	0.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	232.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

MUFG vs. TW: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MUFG vs. TW: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MUFG

2.12%

Banks Industry

Max: 10.27%
Q3: 5.83%
Median: 3.81%
Q1: 2.50%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Yield of 2.12% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TW

0.30%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.26%
Q3: 4.86%
Median: 2.78%
Q1: 1.22%
Min: 0.00%

TW’s Dividend Yield of 0.30% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

65.29%

Banks Industry

Max: 147.07%
Q3: 80.55%
Median: 54.40%
Q1: 35.71%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.29% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TW

16.80%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 200.72%
Q3: 101.92%
Median: 57.97%
Q1: 32.36%
Min: 0.00%

TW’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 16.80% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	TW
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.12%	0.30%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	65.29%	16.80%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

13.50

Banks Industry

Max: 20.05
Q3: 12.65
Median: 10.21
Q1: 7.54
Min: 2.74

A P/E Ratio of 13.50 places MUFG in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

TW

55.34

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 58.89
Q3: 31.00
Median: 18.54
Q1: 12.09
Min: 5.24

A P/E Ratio of 55.34 places TW in the upper quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

2.18

Banks Industry

Max: 5.06
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

TW

15.97

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.49
Q3: 7.41
Median: 4.68
Q1: 2.25
Min: 0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 15.97, TW trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Capital Markets industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

1.18

Banks Industry

Max: 2.18
Q3: 1.36
Median: 1.09
Q1: 0.81
Min: 0.20

MUFG’s P/B Ratio of 1.18 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TW

5.12

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.48
Q3: 4.94
Median: 2.42
Q1: 1.21
Min: 0.38

TW’s P/B Ratio of 5.12 is in the upper tier for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MUFG vs. TW: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	TW
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	13.50	55.34
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.18	15.97
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.18	5.12
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.39	32.46