MUFG vs. OWL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on October 4, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MUFG and OWL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MUFG trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors a convenient way to access its foreign-listed shares. In contrast, OWL is a standard domestic listing.

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
Company Name	Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, Inc.	Blue Owl Capital Inc.
Country	Japan	United States
GICS Sector	Financials	Financials
GICS Industry	Banks	Capital Markets
Market Capitalization	181.83 billion USD	26.24 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	April 2, 2001	December 14, 2020
Security Type	ADR	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MUFG and OWL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MUFG vs. OWL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
5-Day Price Return	-2.32%	-2.08%
13-Week Price Return	16.83%	-11.87%
26-Week Price Return	7.14%	-19.57%
52-Week Price Return	71.92%	-12.01%
Month-to-Date Return	-3.17%	-8.59%
Year-to-Date Return	25.57%	-27.21%
10-Day Avg. Volume	46.86M	9.45M
3-Month Avg. Volume	40.31M	7.61M
3-Month Volatility	29.40%	34.82%
Beta	1.69	1.13

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MUFG

9.11%

Banks Industry

Max: 25.40%
Q3: 15.55%
Median: 12.00%
Q1: 8.98%
Min: -0.10%

MUFG’s Return on Equity of 9.11% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

OWL

3.42%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 38.97%
Q3: 22.24%
Median: 13.52%
Q1: 8.61%
Min: -4.25%

OWL’s Return on Equity of 3.42% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates a less efficient generation of profit from its equity base when compared to its competitors.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MUFG

25.66%

Banks Industry

Max: 54.20%
Q3: 35.73%
Median: 28.97%
Q1: 22.56%
Min: 6.98%

MUFG’s Net Profit Margin of 25.66% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Banks industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

OWL

2.88%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 69.91%
Q3: 37.24%
Median: 24.30%
Q1: 13.06%
Min: -15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, OWL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.88% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MUFG

30.87%

Banks Industry

Max: 63.35%
Q3: 44.73%
Median: 37.24%
Q1: 28.25%
Min: 12.28%

MUFG’s Operating Profit Margin of 30.87% is around the midpoint for the Banks industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

OWL

17.38%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 84.86%
Q3: 47.16%
Median: 32.23%
Q1: 18.65%
Min: -21.87%

OWL’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.38% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.11%	3.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)	0.46%	0.65%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	25.66%	2.88%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	30.87%	17.38%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	--	--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

OWL

0.88

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 3.37
Q3: 1.81
Median: 1.01
Q1: 0.56
Min: 0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

4.55

Banks Industry

Max: 5.78
Q3: 2.66
Median: 1.05
Q1: 0.40
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

OWL

1.38

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 6.52
Q3: 2.79
Median: 0.96
Q1: 0.28
Min: 0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

Banks Industry

Max: --
Q3: --
Median: --
Q1: --
Min: --

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

OWL

5.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 107.59
Q3: 48.41
Median: 10.85
Q1: 4.56
Min: -36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
Current Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.88
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	--	0.83
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	4.55	1.38
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	--	5.03

Growth

Revenue Growth

MUFG vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MUFG vs. OWL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MUFG

1.97%

Banks Industry

Max: 11.03%
Q3: 6.00%
Median: 3.87%
Q1: 2.41%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Yield of 1.97% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

OWL

1.84%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 9.02%
Q3: 4.54%
Median: 2.55%
Q1: 1.27%
Min: 0.00%

OWL’s Dividend Yield of 1.84% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

65.29%

Banks Industry

Max: 134.24%
Q3: 79.39%
Median: 55.09%
Q1: 36.09%
Min: 0.00%

MUFG’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 65.29% is within the typical range for the Banks industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

OWL

610.34%

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 199.38%
Q3: 99.28%
Median: 60.67%
Q1: 32.00%
Min: 0.00%

At 610.34%, OWL’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Capital Markets industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
Dividend Yield (TTM)	1.97%	1.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	65.29%	610.34%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

14.62

Banks Industry

Max: 22.69
Q3: 13.75
Median: 10.32
Q1: 7.73
Min: 2.59

A P/E Ratio of 14.62 places MUFG in the upper quartile for the Banks industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

OWL

331.67

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 51.69
Q3: 29.42
Median: 17.58
Q1: 12.55
Min: 5.59

At 331.67, OWL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MUFG

2.18

Banks Industry

Max: 4.90
Q3: 2.98
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.59
Min: 0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

OWL

9.55

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 14.65
Q3: 7.29
Median: 4.53
Q1: 2.26
Min: 0.04

OWL’s P/S Ratio of 9.55 is in the upper echelon for the Capital Markets industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MUFG

1.20

Banks Industry

Max: 2.09
Q3: 1.40
Median: 1.11
Q1: 0.86
Min: 0.29

MUFG’s P/B Ratio of 1.20 is within the conventional range for the Banks industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

OWL

12.65

Capital Markets Industry

Max: 10.83
Q3: 5.12
Median: 2.66
Q1: 1.19
Min: 0.37

At 12.65, OWL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Capital Markets industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MUFG vs. OWL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Banks and Capital Markets industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MUFG	OWL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	14.62	331.67
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	2.18	9.55
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	1.20	12.65
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	4.73	24.01