Seek Returns logo

MU vs. WFC: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MU and WFC, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMUWFC
Company NameMicron Technology, Inc.Wells Fargo & Company
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyFinancials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentBanks
Market Capitalization131.70 billion USD253.39 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1984June 1, 1972
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MU and WFC by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MU vs. WFC: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMUWFC
5-Day Price Return-4.75%2.14%
13-Week Price Return22.79%8.07%
26-Week Price Return10.20%-2.08%
52-Week Price Return8.63%42.63%
Month-to-Date Return7.82%-1.90%
Year-to-Date Return39.83%12.61%
10-Day Avg. Volume19.04M12.89M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.19M16.78M
3-Month Volatility39.17%24.40%
Beta1.521.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

WFC

11.36%

Banks Industry

Max
26.37%
Q3
15.92%
Median
12.25%
Q1
8.69%
Min
0.15%

WFC’s Return on Equity of 11.36% is on par with the norm for the Banks industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

WFC

22.19%

Banks Industry

Max
54.20%
Q3
35.70%
Median
28.97%
Q1
22.53%
Min
6.98%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Banks industry, WFC’s Net Profit Margin of 22.19% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

WFC

25.35%

Banks Industry

Max
63.35%
Q3
44.59%
Median
37.24%
Q1
28.25%
Min
13.37%

WFC’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.35% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMUWFC
Return on Equity (TTM)13.02%11.36%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.52%1.06%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.41%22.19%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.59%25.35%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.13%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

For the Banks industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MU

0.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

WFC

2.01

Banks Industry

Max
4.75
Q3
2.62
Median
1.02
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Banks industry.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

WFC

--

Banks Industry

Max
--
Q3
--
Median
--
Q1
--
Min
--

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Banks industry.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMUWFC
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.75--
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.89--
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.312.01
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.08--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MU vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MU vs. WFC: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MU

0.40%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

WFC

2.53%

Banks Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
5.83%
Median
3.81%
Q1
2.50%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Yield of 2.53% is consistent with its peers in the Banks industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

WFC

31.00%

Banks Industry

Max
147.07%
Q3
80.55%
Median
54.40%
Q1
35.71%
Min
0.00%

WFC’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 31.00% is in the lower quartile for the Banks industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMUWFC
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%2.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.37%31.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s P/E Ratio of 20.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

WFC

12.27

Banks Industry

Max
20.05
Q3
12.65
Median
10.21
Q1
7.54
Min
2.74

WFC’s P/E Ratio of 12.27 is within the middle range for the Banks industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MU

3.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MU’s P/S Ratio of 3.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

WFC

1.91

Banks Industry

Max
5.06
Q3
2.98
Median
2.24
Q1
1.59
Min
0.45

The P/S Ratio is often not a primary valuation tool in the Banks industry.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

WFC

1.42

Banks Industry

Max
2.18
Q3
1.36
Median
1.09
Q1
0.81
Min
0.20

WFC’s P/B Ratio of 1.42 is in the upper tier for the Banks industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MU vs. WFC: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Banks industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMUWFC
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.8412.27
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.841.91
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.131.42
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)65.0716.66