Seek Returns logo

MU vs. TTWO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MU and TTWO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMUTTWO
Company NameMicron Technology, Inc.Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization203.85 billion USD47.25 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 1, 1984April 15, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MU and TTWO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MU vs. TTWO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMUTTWO
5-Day Price Return3.47%5.83%
13-Week Price Return35.76%6.39%
26-Week Price Return81.61%19.67%
52-Week Price Return55.65%68.81%
Month-to-Date Return40.59%10.76%
Year-to-Date Return98.81%40.35%
10-Day Avg. Volume31.35M2.21M
3-Month Avg. Volume22.70M1.90M
3-Month Volatility44.75%24.29%
Beta1.611.01

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MU

17.05%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 17.05% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-98.81%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
24.06%
Median
13.69%
Q1
5.35%
Min
-17.95%

TTWO has a negative Return on Equity of -98.81%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

22.84%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 22.84% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.92%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.33%
Q3
24.40%
Median
13.94%
Q1
4.28%
Min
-23.67%

TTWO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -72.92%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

26.14%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 26.14% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

TTWO

-72.16%

Entertainment Industry

Max
41.77%
Q3
28.26%
Median
16.13%
Q1
8.03%
Min
-3.93%

TTWO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -72.16%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMUTTWO
Return on Equity (TTM)17.05%-98.81%
Return on Assets (TTM)11.17%-37.91%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)22.84%-72.92%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.14%-72.16%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.79%56.66%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.52 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

TTWO

1.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.76
Q3
4.02
Median
1.55
Q1
0.86
Min
0.38

TTWO’s Current Ratio of 1.16 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MU

0.27

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

TTWO

0.88

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.54
Q3
0.77
Median
0.16
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

TTWO’s leverage is in the upper quartile of the Entertainment industry, with a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.88. While this approach can boost equity growth, it also exposes the company to greater financial vulnerability.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TTWO

-44.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
87.17
Q3
35.59
Median
7.06
Q1
1.13
Min
-44.74

TTWO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -44.74. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMUTTWO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.521.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.791.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.270.88
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.08-44.74

Growth

Revenue Growth

MU vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MU vs. TTWO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MU

0.26%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.26% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.90%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.59%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MU

6.11%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 6.11% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TTWO

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
38.45%
Median
29.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TTWO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMUTTWO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.26%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)6.11%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MU

23.28

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s P/E Ratio of 23.28 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

TTWO

--

Entertainment Industry

Max
92.09
Q3
54.51
Median
28.92
Q1
19.75
Min
2.96

P/E Ratio data for TTWO is currently unavailable.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MU

5.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MU’s P/S Ratio of 5.32 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

TTWO

8.16

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.34
Q3
7.67
Median
5.06
Q1
2.72
Min
0.67

TTWO’s P/S Ratio of 8.16 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.52 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TTWO

12.74

Entertainment Industry

Max
22.84
Q3
10.54
Median
6.60
Q1
2.30
Min
0.65

TTWO’s P/B Ratio of 12.74 is in the upper tier for the Entertainment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MU vs. TTWO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMUTTWO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.28--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)5.328.16
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.5212.74
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)111.60210.39