Seek Returns logo

MU vs. SPOT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MU and SPOT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMUSPOT
Company NameMicron Technology, Inc.Spotify Technology S.A.
CountryUnited StatesLuxembourg
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyCommunication Services
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentEntertainment
Market Capitalization131.17 billion USD144.82 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1984April 3, 2018
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MU and SPOT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MU vs. SPOT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMUSPOT
5-Day Price Return-6.45%0.76%
13-Week Price Return18.81%5.89%
26-Week Price Return22.53%8.56%
52-Week Price Return7.90%104.18%
Month-to-Date Return7.39%12.33%
Year-to-Date Return39.27%57.31%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.82M1.77M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.56M2.22M
3-Month Volatility39.01%44.62%
Beta1.521.69

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SPOT

14.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
42.50%
Q3
22.75%
Median
12.88%
Q1
7.15%
Min
-6.84%

SPOT’s Return on Equity of 14.00% is on par with the norm for the Entertainment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SPOT

4.85%

Entertainment Industry

Max
45.25%
Q3
23.93%
Median
14.60%
Q1
4.89%
Min
-22.94%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Entertainment industry, SPOT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.85% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SPOT

11.11%

Entertainment Industry

Max
46.83%
Q3
28.87%
Median
15.26%
Q1
8.95%
Min
-5.53%

SPOT’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.11% is around the midpoint for the Entertainment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMUSPOT
Return on Equity (TTM)13.02%14.00%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.52%6.62%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.41%4.85%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.59%11.11%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.13%31.63%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SPOT

1.47

Entertainment Industry

Max
6.80
Q3
3.77
Median
1.87
Q1
0.86
Min
0.39

SPOT’s Current Ratio of 1.47 aligns with the median group of the Entertainment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MU

0.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SPOT

0.36

Entertainment Industry

Max
1.65
Q3
0.71
Median
0.14
Q1
0.04
Min
0.00

SPOT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.36 is typical for the Entertainment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SPOT

38.25

Entertainment Industry

Max
62.11
Q3
31.19
Median
7.50
Q1
2.02
Min
-6.33

SPOT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 38.25 is in the upper quartile for the Entertainment industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMUSPOT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.751.47
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.891.46
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.36
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.0838.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

MU vs. SPOT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MU vs. SPOT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MU

0.40%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
2.54%
Q3
1.29%
Median
0.61%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

SPOT

0.00%

Entertainment Industry

Max
82.30%
Q3
45.76%
Median
29.16%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

SPOT has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMUSPOT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.37%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s P/E Ratio of 20.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

SPOT

151.28

Entertainment Industry

Max
53.51
Q3
45.31
Median
33.16
Q1
18.21
Min
3.89

At 151.28, SPOT’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Entertainment industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MU

3.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MU’s P/S Ratio of 3.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SPOT

7.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
12.81
Q3
7.20
Median
4.68
Q1
3.32
Min
0.79

SPOT’s P/S Ratio of 7.34 is in the upper echelon for the Entertainment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

SPOT

20.34

Entertainment Industry

Max
17.11
Q3
8.38
Median
5.24
Q1
2.18
Min
0.67

At 20.34, SPOT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Entertainment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MU vs. SPOT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Entertainment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMUSPOT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.84151.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.847.34
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.1320.34
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)65.0743.24