Seek Returns logo

MU vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MU and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMUQXO
Company NameMicron Technology, Inc.QXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization131.17 billion USD12.99 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 1, 1984April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MU and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MU vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMUQXO
5-Day Price Return-6.45%-8.28%
13-Week Price Return18.81%10.11%
26-Week Price Return22.53%45.51%
52-Week Price Return7.90%57.26%
Month-to-Date Return7.39%-3.89%
Year-to-Date Return39.27%21.26%
10-Day Avg. Volume20.82M7.36M
3-Month Avg. Volume21.56M8.26M
3-Month Volatility39.01%55.82%
Beta1.522.19

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MU

13.02%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MU’s Return on Equity of 13.02% is on par with the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

QXO

-0.34%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.33%
Q3
19.92%
Median
14.05%
Q1
11.46%
Min
0.91%

QXO has a negative Return on Equity of -0.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

18.41%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MU’s Net Profit Margin of 18.41% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

QXO

-1.09%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
17.73%
Q3
10.81%
Median
6.13%
Q1
4.33%
Min
2.09%

QXO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.09%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MU

22.59%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MU’s Operating Profit Margin of 22.59% is around the midpoint for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

QXO

-16.12%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
25.50%
Q3
15.13%
Median
7.46%
Q1
5.44%
Min
3.55%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -16.12%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMUQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)13.02%-0.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)8.52%-0.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)18.41%-1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)22.59%-16.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)37.13%21.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.75

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.75 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

QXO

3.00

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
2.82
Q3
2.13
Median
1.60
Q1
1.43
Min
0.46

QXO’s Current Ratio of 3.00 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MU

0.31

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.31 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QXO

0.35

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.88
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.54
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.75
Q1
2.70
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMUQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.753.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.892.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.310.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)20.08-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MU vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MU vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MU

0.40%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.40% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QXO

0.59%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.99%
Q3
3.04%
Median
1.94%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.59% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MU

8.37%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 8.37% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
95.14%
Q3
62.08%
Median
51.17%
Q1
26.24%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMUQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.40%0.59%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)8.37%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MU

20.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s P/E Ratio of 20.84 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

QXO

--

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
48.55
Q3
26.73
Median
17.17
Q1
10.78
Min
1.62

P/E Ratio data for QXO is currently unavailable.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MU

3.84

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MU’s P/S Ratio of 3.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QXO

6.72

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.88
Q3
2.56
Median
1.02
Q1
0.60
Min
0.29

With a P/S Ratio of 6.72, QXO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MU

2.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MU’s P/B Ratio of 2.13 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QXO

1.46

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
8.77
Q3
4.33
Median
2.00
Q1
1.11
Min
0.35

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.46 is within the conventional range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MU vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMUQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)20.84--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)3.846.72
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.131.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)65.07108.01