Seek Returns logo

MTZ vs. ZTO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTZ and ZTO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MTZ is a standard domestic listing, while ZTO trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMTZZTO
Company NameMasTec, Inc.ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc.
CountryUnited StatesChina
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringAir Freight & Logistics
Market Capitalization13.98 billion USD15.34 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 27, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTZ and ZTO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTZ vs. ZTO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTZZTO
5-Day Price Return1.07%-3.79%
13-Week Price Return17.48%11.53%
26-Week Price Return30.97%-4.64%
52-Week Price Return61.87%2.50%
Month-to-Date Return-6.38%-1.32%
Year-to-Date Return30.11%-0.93%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.86M3.04M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M2.53M
3-Month Volatility28.65%38.51%
Beta1.830.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ZTO

15.30%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
35.27%
Q3
18.47%
Median
11.35%
Q1
7.21%
Min
2.53%

ZTO’s Return on Equity of 15.30% is on par with the norm for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ZTO

20.76%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
10.27%
Q3
6.18%
Median
3.96%
Q1
2.32%
Min
0.61%

ZTO’s Net Profit Margin of 20.76% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ZTO

25.33%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
17.40%
Q3
8.87%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.03%
Min
0.62%

ZTO’s Operating Profit Margin of 25.33% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This demonstrates outstanding efficiency in managing its core operations, which can be a result of strong pricing power or superior cost control.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTZZTO
Return on Equity (TTM)9.20%15.30%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.97%10.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.04%20.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.86%25.33%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.65%29.65%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ZTO

1.05

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.83
Q3
1.47
Median
1.29
Q1
1.05
Min
0.62

ZTO’s Current Ratio of 1.05 falls into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ZTO

0.27

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
1.57
Q3
1.06
Median
0.72
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.27 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ZTO

--

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
49.07
Q3
23.59
Median
8.56
Q1
5.97
Min
-0.60

Interest Coverage Ratio data for ZTO is currently unavailable.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTZZTO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.05
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.87
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.27
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.54--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTZ vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTZ vs. ZTO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
6.43%
Q3
3.10%
Median
2.40%
Q1
0.46%
Min
0.00%

ZTO currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ZTO

0.00%

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
160.95%
Q3
92.80%
Median
54.10%
Q1
0.19%
Min
0.00%

ZTO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTZZTO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ZTO

12.01

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
34.55
Q3
23.34
Median
16.33
Q1
13.38
Min
6.36

In the lower quartile for the Air Freight & Logistics industry, ZTO’s P/E Ratio of 12.01 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ZTO

2.49

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
2.13
Q3
1.16
Median
0.59
Q1
0.36
Min
0.18

With a P/S Ratio of 2.49, ZTO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ZTO

1.82

Air Freight & Logistics Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.81
Median
1.82
Q1
1.20
Min
0.74

ZTO’s P/B Ratio of 1.82 is within the conventional range for the Air Freight & Logistics industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTZ vs. ZTO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Air Freight & Logistics industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTZZTO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.2212.01
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.042.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.561.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.779.58