Seek Returns logo

MTZ vs. SYM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTZ and SYM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMTZSYM
Company NameMasTec, Inc.Symbotic Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringMachinery
Market Capitalization16.97 billion USD33.19 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGM
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 9, 2021
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTZ and SYM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTZ vs. SYM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTZSYM
5-Day Price Return3.34%1.66%
13-Week Price Return24.87%38.74%
26-Week Price Return73.41%143.34%
52-Week Price Return73.30%111.21%
Month-to-Date Return17.13%13.64%
Year-to-Date Return56.32%127.33%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.95M2.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.91M2.24M
3-Month Volatility33.54%83.74%
Beta1.912.06

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SYM

-7.69%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

SYM has a negative Return on Equity of -7.69%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

SYM

-0.71%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

SYM has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SYM

-5.20%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

SYM has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -5.20%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTZSYM
Return on Equity (TTM)9.20%-7.69%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.97%-0.88%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.04%-0.71%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.86%-5.20%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.65%16.30%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

SYM

1.08

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

SYM’s Current Ratio of 1.08 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SYM

0.00

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, SYM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

Interest Coverage Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTZSYM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.08
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.90
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.54--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTZ vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTZ vs. SYM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

SYM currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

SYM

0.00%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

SYM has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTZSYM
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

62.85

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 62.85, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

SYM

--

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

P/E Ratio data for SYM is currently unavailable.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

1.28

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.28 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

SYM

15.56

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

With a P/S Ratio of 15.56, SYM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Machinery industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

SYM

108.69

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

At 108.69, SYM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Machinery industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTZ vs. SYM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTZSYM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)62.85--
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.2815.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.56108.69
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.1271.44