MTZ vs. ROP: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 28, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MTZ and ROP, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
Company Name	MasTec, Inc.	Roper Technologies, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Information Technology
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Software
Market Capitalization	14.20 billion USD	56.89 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NasdaqGS
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	February 13, 1992
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTZ and ROP by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTZ vs. ROP: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
5-Day Price Return	3.64%	0.33%
13-Week Price Return	15.80%	-7.87%
26-Week Price Return	42.28%	-7.91%
52-Week Price Return	62.34%	-3.31%
Month-to-Date Return	-4.87%	-3.95%
Year-to-Date Return	32.22%	1.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume	0.86M	0.83M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.90M	0.60M
3-Month Volatility	28.63%	16.06%
Beta	1.82	1.02

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 29.61%
Q3: 17.18%
Median: 10.42%
Q1: 8.10%
Min: -0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

ROP

8.08%

Software Industry

Max: 59.01%
Q3: 21.98%
Median: 7.15%
Q1: -11.12%
Min: -51.24%

ROP’s Return on Equity of 8.08% is on par with the norm for the Software industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 11.14%
Q3: 6.17%
Median: 3.85%
Q1: 2.40%
Min: -0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

ROP

20.62%

Software Industry

Max: 48.14%
Q3: 18.23%
Median: 5.60%
Q1: -9.22%
Min: -49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 20.62% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 17.56%
Q3: 9.36%
Median: 5.46%
Q1: 3.47%
Min: -1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

ROP

28.06%

Software Industry

Max: 57.34%
Q3: 20.60%
Median: 7.84%
Q1: -8.72%
Min: -51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 28.06% places ROP in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
Return on Equity (TTM)	9.20%	8.08%
Return on Assets (TTM)	2.97%	4.83%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	2.04%	20.62%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	3.86%	28.06%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	12.65%	68.87%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 1.98
Q3: 1.53
Median: 1.24
Q1: 1.05
Min: 0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

ROP

0.46

Software Industry

Max: 3.83
Q3: 2.31
Median: 1.45
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.24

ROP’s Current Ratio of 0.46 falls into the lower quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 2.49
Q3: 1.19
Median: 0.63
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

ROP

0.45

Software Industry

Max: 2.14
Q3: 0.90
Median: 0.29
Q1: 0.00
Min: 0.00

ROP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 23.59
Q3: 14.49
Median: 8.20
Q1: 5.26
Min: -6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

ROP

80.97

Software Industry

Max: 67.02
Q3: 19.86
Median: 0.70
Q1: -12.50
Min: -53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 80.97, ROP demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.22	0.46
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.14	0.43
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	0.77	0.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	2.54	80.97

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTZ vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTZ vs. ROP: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 6.28%
Q3: 3.25%
Median: 2.02%
Q1: 0.23%
Min: 0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

ROP

0.58%

Software Industry

Max: 0.08%
Q3: 0.03%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ROP’s Dividend Yield of 0.58% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 139.17%
Q3: 69.47%
Median: 40.99%
Q1: 10.51%
Min: 0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

ROP

21.99%

Software Industry

Max: 1.32%
Q3: 0.53%
Median: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

At 21.99%, ROP’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.58%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	21.99%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 36.96
Q3: 24.81
Median: 15.45
Q1: 12.51
Min: 2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

ROP

37.65

Software Industry

Max: 149.35
Q3: 100.21
Median: 47.97
Q1: 26.77
Min: 11.68

ROP’s P/E Ratio of 37.65 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 3.22
Q3: 1.63
Median: 0.61
Q1: 0.48
Min: 0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

ROP

7.76

Software Industry

Max: 25.24
Q3: 13.52
Median: 8.15
Q1: 4.87
Min: 0.98

ROP’s P/S Ratio of 7.76 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max: 5.74
Q3: 3.33
Median: 1.49
Q1: 1.20
Min: 0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

ROP

3.10

Software Industry

Max: 30.95
Q3: 14.91
Median: 7.75
Q1: 3.60
Min: 0.38

ROP’s P/B Ratio of 3.10 is in the lower quartile for the Software industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

MTZ vs. ROP: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MTZ	ROP
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	51.22	37.65
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	1.04	7.76
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	4.56	3.10
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	14.77	25.39