Seek Returns logo

MTZ vs. POOL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTZ and POOL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMTZPOOL
Company NameMasTec, Inc.Pool Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringDistributors
Market Capitalization14.20 billion USD11.86 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENasdaqGS
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973October 13, 1995
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTZ and POOL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTZ vs. POOL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTZPOOL
5-Day Price Return3.64%2.99%
13-Week Price Return15.80%5.41%
26-Week Price Return42.28%-7.60%
52-Week Price Return62.34%-10.87%
Month-to-Date Return-4.87%3.15%
Year-to-Date Return32.22%-6.77%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.86M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M0.59M
3-Month Volatility28.63%30.89%
Beta1.821.12

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
29.61%
Q3
17.18%
Median
10.42%
Q1
8.10%
Min
-0.10%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

POOL

31.34%

Distributors Industry

Max
18.85%
Q3
17.85%
Median
13.11%
Q1
11.23%
Min
11.19%

POOL’s Return on Equity of 31.34% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
6.17%
Median
3.85%
Q1
2.40%
Min
-0.05%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

POOL

7.79%

Distributors Industry

Max
5.04%
Q3
4.92%
Median
4.56%
Q1
4.55%
Min
4.54%

POOL’s Net Profit Margin of 7.79% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Distributors industry. This demonstrates outstanding operational efficiency and a strong competitive advantage in converting revenue into profit.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.56%
Q3
9.36%
Median
5.46%
Q1
3.47%
Min
-1.93%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

POOL

11.13%

Distributors Industry

Max
11.14%
Q3
7.80%
Median
5.53%
Q1
3.65%
Min
3.17%

An Operating Profit Margin of 11.13% places POOL in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTZPOOL
Return on Equity (TTM)9.20%31.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.97%11.64%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.04%7.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.86%11.13%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.65%29.46%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
1.98
Q3
1.53
Median
1.24
Q1
1.05
Min
0.66

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

POOL

2.52

Distributors Industry

Max
1.81
Q3
1.72
Median
1.48
Q1
1.24
Min
1.15

POOL’s Current Ratio of 2.52 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.49
Q3
1.19
Median
0.63
Q1
0.29
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

POOL

0.95

Distributors Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.98
Median
0.75
Q1
0.52
Min
0.46

POOL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.95 is typical for the Distributors industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
23.59
Q3
14.49
Median
8.20
Q1
5.26
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

POOL

12.28

Distributors Industry

Max
13.15
Q3
10.84
Median
5.59
Q1
4.01
Min
3.80

POOL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 12.28 is in the upper quartile for the Distributors industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTZPOOL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.222.52
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.82
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.95
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.5412.28

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTZ vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTZ vs. POOL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
6.28%
Q3
3.25%
Median
2.02%
Q1
0.23%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

POOL

1.52%

Distributors Industry

Max
44.83%
Q3
35.02%
Median
4.81%
Q1
3.26%
Min
1.54%

POOL’s Dividend Yield of 1.52% is below the typical range for the Distributors industry. This indicates that shareholder returns are likely driven more by potential capital appreciation than by dividend income.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
69.47%
Median
40.99%
Q1
10.51%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

POOL

44.67%

Distributors Industry

Max
1,122.47%
Q3
858.23%
Median
55.08%
Q1
44.32%
Min
34.92%

POOL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 44.67% is within the typical range for the Distributors industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTZPOOL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%1.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%44.67%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

51.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.96
Q3
24.81
Median
15.45
Q1
12.51
Min
2.74

At 51.22, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

POOL

29.38

Distributors Industry

Max
28.99
Q3
25.04
Median
23.42
Q1
13.71
Min
6.24

At 29.38, POOL’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Distributors industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

1.04

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
3.22
Q3
1.63
Median
0.61
Q1
0.48
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.04 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

POOL

2.29

Distributors Industry

Max
1.14
Q3
1.14
Median
0.96
Q1
0.61
Min
0.28

With a P/S Ratio of 2.29, POOL trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.74
Q3
3.33
Median
1.49
Q1
1.20
Min
0.23

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

POOL

8.44

Distributors Industry

Max
3.72
Q3
3.57
Median
3.12
Q1
2.41
Min
1.47

At 8.44, POOL’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Distributors industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTZ vs. POOL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTZPOOL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)51.2229.38
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.042.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.568.44
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)14.7724.87