MTZ vs. PH: MasTec vs. Parker-Hannifin Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but MTZ is classified in Construction & Engineering while PH is classified in Machinery.

Company profile comparison for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Profile Item	MTZ	PH
Name	MasTec, Inc.	Parker-Hannifin Corporation
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Industrials	Industrials
GICS Industry Group	Capital Goods	Capital Goods
GICS Industry	Construction & Engineering	Machinery
GICS Sub-Industry	Construction & Engineering	Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components
Market Capitalization	13.98 billion USD	115.73 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	February 21, 1973	March 17, 1980
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

MTZ

GSPC

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Total Return (1Y)	-7.45%	14.13%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	57.37%	33.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	13.96%	25.35%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

MTZ

GSPC

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	55.99%	27.33%
Beta (5Y)	1.91	1.12
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-63.67%	-28.64%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.63M	627.57K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

MTZ and PH are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	-0.21	0.36
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	-0.28	0.53

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 24.95% sits in the top ROE quartile, while MasTec (MTZ) at 14.53% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for PH.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

14.53%

Max: 40.55%
Q3: 19.29%
MTZ: 14.53%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

24.95%

Max: 40.55%
PH: 24.95%
Q3: 19.29%
Median: 12.12%
Q1: 4.08%
Min: -17.12%

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their ROE against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 16.62% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of MasTec (MTZ) at 2.80%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

2.80%

Max: 27.47%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
MTZ: 2.80%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

16.62%

Max: 27.47%
PH: 16.62%
Q3: 12.10%
Median: 6.30%
Q1: 1.40%
Min: -12.89%

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their net margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 21.90% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of MasTec (MTZ) at 5.64%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

5.64%

Max: 36.60%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
MTZ: 5.64%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

21.90%

Max: 36.60%
PH: 21.90%
Q3: 18.33%
Median: 11.12%
Q1: 5.14%
Min: -12.63%

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their operating margin against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
ROE (TTM)	14.53%	24.95%
ROA (TTM)	4.43%	8.56%
Net Margin (TTM)	2.80%	16.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)	5.64%	21.90%
Gross Margin (TTM)	12.74%	37.70%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both MasTec (MTZ) at 16.22% and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 8.31% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

MasTec (MTZ) at 146.12% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.01%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Revenue Growth (YoY)	16.22%	8.31%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	13.51%	4.09%
EPS Growth (YoY)	146.12%	5.01%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	129.40%	21.09%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both MasTec (MTZ) at 1.39 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

1.39

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
MTZ: 1.39
Min: 0.36

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.94

Max: 5.22
Q3: 2.95
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.43
PH: 0.94
Min: 0.36

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their current ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 1.09 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while MasTec (MTZ) at 1.12 uses more debt funding than most peers.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

1.12

Max: 2.33
MTZ: 1.12
Q3: 1.12
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

PH

Capital Goods industry group

1.09

Max: 2.33
Q3: 1.12
PH: 1.09
Median: 0.60
Q1: 0.29
Min: 0.00

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.39	0.94
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	1.12	1.09
Net Debt / EBITDA	3.08	2.81

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a yield of 0.85%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
Median: 0.24%
MTZ: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

0.85%

Max: 2.66%
Q3: 1.14%
PH: 0.85%
Median: 0.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Parker-Hannifin (PH) reports a payout of 26.11%, ranking against industry peers normally.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.00%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
Median: 6.86%
MTZ: 0.00%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

PH

Capital Goods industry group

26.11%

Max: 67.39%
Q3: 28.02%
PH: 26.11%
Median: 6.86%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.00%	0.85%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	0.00%	26.11%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both MasTec (MTZ) at 28.40 and Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 31.53 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

28.40

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
MTZ: 28.40
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

31.53

Max: 59.38
Q3: 35.92
PH: 31.53
Median: 25.41
Q1: 19.47
Min: 3.03

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

MasTec (MTZ) at 0.81 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 5.16 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

0.81

Max: 7.54
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
MTZ: 0.81
Min: 0.03

PH

Capital Goods industry group

5.16

Max: 7.54
PH: 5.16
Q3: 3.76
Median: 2.15
Q1: 1.03
Min: 0.03

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

MasTec (MTZ) at 3.35 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Parker-Hannifin (PH) at 7.25 carries an above-peer premium to book — PH is pricier on assets.

MTZ

Capital Goods industry group

3.35

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.00
MTZ: 3.35
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

PH

Capital Goods industry group

7.25

Max: 9.66
PH: 7.25
Q3: 5.00
Median: 3.12
Q1: 1.81
Min: -1.08

MasTec (MTZ) vs. Parker-Hannifin (PH): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Capital Goods industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for MasTec (MTZ) and Parker-Hannifin (PH)
Metric	MTZ	PH
P/E Ratio (TTM)	28.40	31.53
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.81	5.16
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	3.35	7.25
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	1.00%	2.45%