Seek Returns logo

MTZ vs. PH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTZ and PH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMTZPH
Company NameMasTec, Inc.Parker-Hannifin Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryConstruction & EngineeringMachinery
Market Capitalization17.03 billion USD96.58 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 21, 1973March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTZ and PH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTZ vs. PH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTZPH
5-Day Price Return2.99%1.28%
13-Week Price Return25.55%6.13%
26-Week Price Return84.91%25.56%
52-Week Price Return72.47%21.63%
Month-to-Date Return1.41%0.67%
Year-to-Date Return58.52%20.00%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.79M0.41M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.90M0.61M
3-Month Volatility33.30%20.18%
Beta1.971.27

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTZ

9.20%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
26.79%
Q3
16.47%
Median
10.66%
Q1
8.46%
Min
-1.86%

MTZ’s Return on Equity of 9.20% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

PH

26.61%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, PH’s Return on Equity of 26.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

2.04%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
11.67%
Q3
6.13%
Median
3.82%
Q1
2.31%
Min
-2.77%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Net Profit Margin of 2.04% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

PH

17.79%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 17.79% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTZ

3.86%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
17.78%
Q3
9.61%
Median
6.19%
Q1
3.73%
Min
-1.78%

MTZ’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.86% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

PH

21.67%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 21.67% places PH in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTZPH
Return on Equity (TTM)9.20%26.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.97%12.15%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.04%17.79%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)3.86%21.67%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)12.65%37.01%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

1.22

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.50
Median
1.23
Q1
1.00
Min
0.65

MTZ’s Current Ratio of 1.22 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

PH

1.19

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

PH’s Current Ratio of 1.19 falls into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

0.77

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.37
Q3
1.24
Median
0.62
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

MTZ’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.77 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

PH

0.68

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

PH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.68 is typical for the Machinery industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

2.54

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
36.37
Q3
17.88
Median
8.20
Q1
4.98
Min
-6.49

In the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry, MTZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 2.54 indicates a tighter cushion for servicing debt, suggesting less financial flexibility than many of its competitors.

PH

16.44

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

PH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.44 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTZPH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.221.19
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.140.66
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.770.68
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)2.5416.44

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTZ vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTZ vs. PH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
5.80%
Q3
3.33%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.21%
Min
0.00%

MTZ currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

PH

0.89%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Yield of 0.89% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

0.00%

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
139.17%
Q3
74.39%
Median
51.48%
Q1
15.67%
Min
0.00%

MTZ has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

PH

24.38%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

PH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 24.38% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTZPH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.89%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%24.38%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

64.37

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
41.00
Q3
26.91
Median
16.02
Q1
13.49
Min
1.65

At 64.37, MTZ’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

PH

27.44

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

PH’s P/E Ratio of 27.44 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTZ

1.31

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
2.93
Q3
1.65
Median
0.71
Q1
0.45
Min
0.11

MTZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.31 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

PH

4.88

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

PH’s P/S Ratio of 4.88 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTZ

4.56

Construction & Engineering Industry

Max
7.96
Q3
4.06
Median
1.98
Q1
1.23
Min
0.24

MTZ’s P/B Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper tier for the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

PH

6.52

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

PH’s P/B Ratio of 6.52 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MTZ vs. PH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction & Engineering and Machinery industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTZPH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)64.3727.44
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.314.88
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.566.52
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)18.5629.00