Seek Returns logo

MTSI vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTSI and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMTSIUBER
Company NameMACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.Uber Technologies, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentGround Transportation
Market Capitalization9.43 billion USD198.45 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 15, 2012May 10, 2019
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTSI and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTSI vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTSIUBER
5-Day Price Return4.70%-0.17%
13-Week Price Return4.24%8.14%
26-Week Price Return2.38%17.25%
52-Week Price Return21.23%29.80%
Month-to-Date Return-7.62%8.44%
Year-to-Date Return-2.48%57.76%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.60M15.19M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.71M20.51M
3-Month Volatility33.41%29.36%
Beta1.501.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTSI

-5.90%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MTSI has a negative Return on Equity of -5.90%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
22.11%
Q3
13.84%
Median
9.66%
Q1
7.55%
Min
0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTSI

-7.71%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MTSI has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.71%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
32.20%
Q3
18.59%
Median
7.11%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTSI

-8.33%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MTSI has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -8.33%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
41.31%
Q3
23.16%
Median
11.33%
Q1
6.82%
Min
-12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTSIUBER
Return on Equity (TTM)-5.90%62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)-3.72%24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7.71%26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-8.33%9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.76%33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTSI

3.83

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MTSI’s Current Ratio of 3.83 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.03
Q3
1.26
Median
0.89
Q1
0.73
Min
0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTSI

0.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MTSI’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
2.51
Q3
1.51
Median
1.06
Q1
0.47
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTSI

32.99

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MTSI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 32.99 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
51.07
Q3
22.54
Median
7.94
Q1
2.72
Min
-24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTSIUBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)3.831.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)2.930.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.450.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)32.99-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTSI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTSI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTSI

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTSI currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
5.44%
Q3
2.49%
Median
1.53%
Q1
0.39%
Min
0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTSI

0.00%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTSI has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
137.07%
Q3
74.71%
Median
41.16%
Q1
15.12%
Min
0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTSIUBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTSI

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MTSI is currently unavailable.

UBER

15.49

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
42.59
Q3
24.86
Median
16.38
Q1
12.79
Min
4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 15.49 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTSI

9.89

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MTSI’s P/S Ratio of 9.89 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UBER

4.13

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.02
Q3
2.20
Median
1.23
Q1
0.87
Min
0.22

With a P/S Ratio of 4.13, UBER trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Ground Transportation industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTSI

8.28

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MTSI’s P/B Ratio of 8.28 is in the upper tier for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max
4.95
Q3
2.78
Median
1.38
Q1
1.17
Min
0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MTSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTSIUBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--15.49
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)9.894.13
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)8.288.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)52.2222.90