Seek Returns logo

MTD vs. UHS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MTD and UHS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMTDUHS
Company NameMettler-Toledo International Inc.Universal Health Services, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorHealth CareHealth Care
GICS IndustryLife Sciences Tools & ServicesHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization26.47 billion USD11.61 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 14, 1997July 9, 1981
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MTD and UHS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MTD vs. UHS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTDUHS
5-Day Price Return0.57%-0.84%
13-Week Price Return10.53%-5.20%
26-Week Price Return-0.10%1.32%
52-Week Price Return-9.62%-21.73%
Month-to-Date Return4.18%9.59%
Year-to-Date Return5.03%1.67%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.12M0.71M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.18M0.89M
3-Month Volatility28.53%31.16%
Beta1.401.30

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MTD

1,675.84%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
19.96%
Q3
11.55%
Median
6.22%
Q1
3.86%
Min
-6.95%

MTD’s Return on Equity of 1,675.84% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UHS

18.62%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
26.03%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.26%
Q1
4.13%
Min
-3.62%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s Return on Equity of 18.62% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MTD

21.46%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
27.28%
Q3
16.17%
Median
7.24%
Q1
3.00%
Min
-3.05%

A Net Profit Margin of 21.46% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UHS

7.66%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
12.40%
Q3
5.93%
Median
1.96%
Q1
0.93%
Min
-6.10%

A Net Profit Margin of 7.66% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MTD

26.49%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
33.15%
Q3
19.34%
Median
13.02%
Q1
8.05%
Min
-4.38%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.49% places MTD in the upper quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UHS

10.99%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.05%
Q3
10.21%
Median
4.22%
Q1
1.98%
Min
-4.27%

An Operating Profit Margin of 10.99% places UHS in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTDUHS
Return on Equity (TTM)1,675.84%18.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)25.15%8.60%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)21.46%7.66%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)26.49%10.99%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)59.94%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

1.12

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.77
Median
1.85
Q1
1.40
Min
0.43

MTD’s Current Ratio of 1.12 falls into the lower quartile for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

UHS

1.29

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.01
Q3
1.49
Median
1.30
Q1
0.94
Min
0.17

UHS’s Current Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the median group of the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

81.23

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.75
Q3
0.83
Median
0.41
Q1
0.18
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 81.23, MTD operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UHS

0.65

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.17
Q3
1.18
Median
0.74
Q1
0.45
Min
0.00

UHS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.65 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MTD

15.60

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
29.61
Q3
23.24
Median
6.07
Q1
2.18
Min
-14.08

MTD’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UHS

9.05

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.15
Median
5.45
Q1
2.04
Min
-4.44

UHS’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 9.05 is in the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTDUHS
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.121.29
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.671.19
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)81.230.65
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)15.609.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

MTD vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MTD vs. UHS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
1.80%
Q3
0.78%
Median
0.37%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

UHS

0.45%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.38%
Q3
2.22%
Median
0.55%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Yield of 0.45% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MTD

0.00%

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
156.00%
Q3
65.73%
Median
23.81%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MTD has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

UHS

4.19%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
186.69%
Q3
74.82%
Median
26.76%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UHS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 4.19% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTDUHS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.45%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%4.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MTD

32.53

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
117.96
Q3
65.59
Median
37.26
Q1
27.51
Min
1.73

MTD’s P/E Ratio of 32.53 is within the middle range for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UHS

9.33

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
55.89
Q3
30.85
Median
21.17
Q1
12.63
Min
0.00

In the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UHS’s P/E Ratio of 9.33 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MTD

6.98

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
12.46
Q3
6.70
Median
4.24
Q1
2.68
Min
0.73

MTD’s P/S Ratio of 6.98 is in the upper echelon for the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UHS

0.71

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
1.74
Median
0.67
Q1
0.24
Min
0.00

UHS’s P/S Ratio of 0.71 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MTD

1,299.40

Life Sciences Tools & Services Industry

Max
7.99
Q3
4.69
Median
3.30
Q1
1.88
Min
1.02

At 1,299.40, MTD’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Life Sciences Tools & Services industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UHS

1.66

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.61
Q3
4.32
Median
2.53
Q1
1.14
Min
0.77

UHS’s P/B Ratio of 1.66 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MTD vs. UHS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Life Sciences Tools & Services and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTDUHS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)32.539.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)6.980.71
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)1,299.401.66
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)31.8413.05