Seek Returns logo

MT vs. SUZ: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MT and SUZ, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Both MT and SUZ offer U.S. investors access to foreign companies, with MT trading as New York Registered Shares and SUZ as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR).

SymbolMTSUZ
Company NameArcelorMittal S.A.Suzano S.A.
CountryLuxembourgBrazil
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryMetals & MiningPaper & Forest Products
Market Capitalization25.50 billion USD12.11 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateAugust 7, 1997November 4, 2008
Security TypeNY Reg ShrsADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MT and SUZ by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MT vs. SUZ: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMTSUZ
5-Day Price Return-1.33%0.23%
13-Week Price Return6.22%2.53%
26-Week Price Return6.73%-8.82%
52-Week Price Return36.37%-6.74%
Month-to-Date Return4.91%0.88%
Year-to-Date Return28.71%-14.84%
10-Day Avg. Volume1.41M3.93M
3-Month Avg. Volume1.72M5.46M
3-Month Volatility29.01%23.69%
Beta1.340.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MT

4.80%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

MT’s Return on Equity of 4.80% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

SUZ

20.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.82%
Q3
5.52%
Median
4.14%
Q1
2.38%
Min
-1.81%

SUZ’s Return on Equity of 20.16% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MT

4.11%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

MT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

SUZ

15.26%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
18.06%
Q3
11.46%
Median
3.39%
Q1
1.84%
Min
-2.16%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.26% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MT

6.59%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

MT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.59% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

SUZ

26.63%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
31.11%
Q3
16.36%
Median
6.08%
Q1
4.04%
Min
-2.64%

An Operating Profit Margin of 26.63% places SUZ in the upper quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMTSUZ
Return on Equity (TTM)4.80%20.16%
Return on Assets (TTM)2.68%4.94%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)4.11%15.26%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.59%26.63%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)-81.21%37.73%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MT

1.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

MT’s Current Ratio of 1.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

SUZ

3.16

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
3.03
Q3
2.03
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.99

SUZ’s Current Ratio of 3.16 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MT

0.25

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

MT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

SUZ

2.28

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.61
Q3
0.82
Median
0.56
Q1
0.27
Min
0.05

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.28, SUZ operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Paper & Forest Products industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MT

5.88

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

MT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

SUZ

0.53

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
16.93
Q3
14.16
Median
7.41
Q1
2.72
Min
-0.13

SUZ’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.53 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMTSUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.403.16
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.442.47
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.252.28
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)5.880.53

Growth

Revenue Growth

MT vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MT vs. SUZ: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MT

1.41%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MT’s Dividend Yield of 1.41% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

SUZ

3.79%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
6.30%
Q3
3.72%
Median
2.41%
Q1
1.71%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 3.79%, SUZ offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Paper & Forest Products industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MT

11.71%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

MT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.71% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

SUZ

15.16%

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
495.87%
Q3
219.88%
Median
83.21%
Q1
24.91%
Min
0.00%

SUZ’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 15.16% is in the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMTSUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.41%3.79%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)11.71%15.16%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MT

11.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

MT’s P/E Ratio of 11.47 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

SUZ

8.48

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
36.56
Q3
23.55
Median
16.47
Q1
13.85
Min
5.22

In the lower quartile for the Paper & Forest Products industry, SUZ’s P/E Ratio of 8.48 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MT

0.47

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, MT’s P/S Ratio of 0.47 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

SUZ

1.29

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
2.15
Q3
1.30
Median
0.80
Q1
0.63
Min
0.30

SUZ’s P/S Ratio of 1.29 aligns with the market consensus for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MT

0.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

MT’s P/B Ratio of 0.49 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

SUZ

1.50

Paper & Forest Products Industry

Max
1.90
Q3
1.25
Median
0.87
Q1
0.73
Min
0.25

SUZ’s P/B Ratio of 1.50 is in the upper tier for the Paper & Forest Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MT vs. SUZ: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Metals & Mining and Paper & Forest Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMTSUZ
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)11.478.48
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)0.471.29
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)0.491.50
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)13.0311.53