MT vs. SUZ: ArcelorMittal vs. Suzano Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ) both fall under the Materials industry group, but MT is classified in Metals & Mining while SUZ is classified in Paper & Forest Products.

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ) trade as ADRs — their core financials are comparable, but keep FX, depositary-program fees, and dividend withholding in view for each.

Company profile comparison for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Profile Item	MT	SUZ
Name	ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares	Suzano S.A. - Sponsored ADR
Country/Region	Luxembourg	Brazil
GICS Sector	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry Group	Materials	Materials
GICS Industry	Metals & Mining	Paper & Forest Products
GICS Sub-Industry	Steel	Paper Products
Market Capitalization	45.85 billion USD	11.90 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	August 7, 1997	November 4, 2008
Security Type	ADR	ADR

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

SUZ

GSPC

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Total Return (1Y)	65.49%	9.33%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	45.03%	-1.70%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	16.55%	4.04%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

SUZ

GSPC

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Suzano (SUZ) is defensive at 0.56 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.

Risk profile metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	44.08%	30.42%
Beta (5Y)	1.49	0.56
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-45.99%	-38.50%
Avg. Volume (3M)	1.35M	3.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

MT and SUZ are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	1.39	0.17
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	2.23	0.26

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% and Suzano (SUZ) at 16.20% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

MT

Materials industry group

1.83%

Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
Median: 8.76%
MT: 1.83%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

SUZ

Materials industry group

16.20%

Max: 52.88%
Q3: 19.49%
SUZ: 16.20%
Median: 8.76%
Q1: -3.41%
Min: -32.81%

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their ROE against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64% and Suzano (SUZ) at 15.94% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

MT

Materials industry group

1.64%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
Median: 5.28%
MT: 1.64%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

SUZ

Materials industry group

15.94%

Max: 38.66%
Q3: 15.98%
SUZ: 15.94%
Median: 5.28%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: -20.40%

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their net margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16% and Suzano (SUZ) at 9.76% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

MT

Materials industry group

6.16%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
MT: 6.16%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

SUZ

Materials industry group

9.76%

Max: 66.70%
Q3: 28.92%
Median: 12.56%
SUZ: 9.76%
Q1: 3.28%
Min: -14.07%

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their operating margin against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
ROE (TTM)	1.83%	16.20%
ROA (TTM)	1.31%	2.54%
Net Margin (TTM)	1.64%	15.94%
Operating Margin (TTM)	6.16%	9.76%
Gross Margin (TTM)	8.16%	26.68%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Suzano (SUZ) at 5.72% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Only one side can be read here: ArcelorMittal (MT) reports EPS growth of 143.20%, ranked against its industry; Suzano (SUZ) has no EPS growth figure this period.

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Revenue Growth (YoY)	-1.74%	5.72%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	-8.41%	0.19%
EPS Growth (YoY)	143.20%	--
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-26.09%	-14.94%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Suzano (SUZ) at 2.54 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for MT.

MT

Materials industry group

1.41

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
MT: 1.41
Min: 0.16

SUZ

Materials industry group

2.54

Max: 5.96
Q3: 3.30
SUZ: 2.54
Median: 2.24
Q1: 1.45
Min: 0.16

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their current ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Suzano (SUZ) at 1.83 uses more debt funding than most peers.

MT

Materials industry group

0.24

Max: 1.98
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
MT: 0.24
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

SUZ

Materials industry group

1.83

Max: 1.98
SUZ: 1.83
Q3: 0.89
Median: 0.47
Q1: 0.13
Min: 0.00

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.41	2.54
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.24	1.83
Net Debt / EBITDA	2.08	4.28

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% and Suzano (SUZ) at 0.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

MT

Materials industry group

0.99%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
MT: 0.99%
Median: 0.38%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SUZ

Materials industry group

0.05%

Max: 4.52%
Q3: 1.85%
Median: 0.38%
SUZ: 0.05%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Suzano (SUZ) at 17.55% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

MT

Materials industry group

52.92%

Max: 83.62%
MT: 52.92%
Q3: 41.37%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SUZ

Materials industry group

17.55%

Max: 83.62%
Q3: 41.37%
SUZ: 17.55%
Median: 9.54%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.99%	0.05%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	52.92%	17.55%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Suzano (SUZ) at 7.49 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

MT

Materials industry group

44.51

Max: 59.00
MT: 44.51
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
Min: 3.93

SUZ

Materials industry group

7.49

Max: 59.00
Q3: 32.93
Median: 18.82
Q1: 11.96
SUZ: 7.49
Min: 3.93

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 and Suzano (SUZ) at 0.23 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

MT

Materials industry group

0.72

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
MT: 0.72
Min: 0.00

SUZ

Materials industry group

0.23

Max: 9.62
Q3: 4.34
Median: 1.87
Q1: 0.73
SUZ: 0.23
Min: 0.00

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Suzano (SUZ) at 1.16 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 is valued near its industry’s middle — SUZ is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.

MT

Materials industry group

1.70

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
MT: 1.70
Q1: 1.26
Min: -0.17

SUZ

Materials industry group

1.16

Max: 6.59
Q3: 3.55
Median: 2.08
Q1: 1.26
SUZ: 1.16
Min: -0.17

ArcelorMittal (MT) vs. Suzano (SUZ): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Materials industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for ArcelorMittal (MT) and Suzano (SUZ)
Metric	MT	SUZ
P/E Ratio (TTM)	44.51	7.49
P/S Ratio (TTM)	0.72	0.23
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.70	1.16
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	-1.75%	-7.73%