MT vs. NTR: ArcelorMittal vs. Nutrien Stock Comparison
How do ArcelorMittal (MT) and Nutrien (NTR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
ArcelorMittal (MT) and Nutrien (NTR) both fall under the Materials industry group, but MT is classified in Metals & Mining while NTR is classified in Chemicals.
Nutrien (NTR) trades as ordinary local shares, while ArcelorMittal (MT) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | ArcelorMittal NY Registry Shares | Nutrien Ltd. |
| Country/Region | Luxembourg | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 45.85 billion USD | 33.89 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | August 7, 1997 | January 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 65.49% | 30.80% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 45.03% | 13.84% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 16.55% | 4.29% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
ArcelorMittal (MT) has an aggressive beta of 1.49, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Nutrien (NTR) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 44.08% | 32.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.49 | 0.64 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.99% | -58.17% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.35M | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.39 | 0.81 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.23 | 1.18 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.83% and Nutrien (NTR) at 8.76% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
MT
Materials industry group
1.83%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- MT
- 1.83%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
NTR
Materials industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- NTR
- 8.76%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.64% and Nutrien (NTR) at 8.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MT
Materials industry group
1.64%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- MT
- 1.64%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
NTR
Materials industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- NTR
- 8.04%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 6.16% and Nutrien (NTR) at 10.97% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MT
Materials industry group
6.16%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- MT
- 6.16%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
NTR
Materials industry group
10.97%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- NTR
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 1.83% | 8.76% |
| ROA (TTM) | 1.31% | 4.24% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 1.64% | 8.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 6.16% | 10.97% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 8.16% | 31.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Nutrien (NTR) at 3.52% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at -1.74% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 143.20% and Nutrien (NTR) at 242.65% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -1.74% | 3.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -8.41% | -10.80% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 143.20% | 242.65% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -26.09% | -30.99% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.41 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
MT
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- MT
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
NTR
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- NTR
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.24 and Nutrien (NTR) at 0.55 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
MT
Materials industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- MT
- 0.24
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
NTR
Materials industry group
0.55
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- NTR
- 0.55
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.41 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.24 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 2.08 | 2.38 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Nutrien (NTR) at 3.03% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.99% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, NTR the richer one.
MT
Materials industry group
0.99%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- MT
- 0.99%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTR
Materials industry group
3.03%
- Max
- 4.52%
- NTR
- 3.03%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 52.92% and Nutrien (NTR) at 47.93% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
MT
Materials industry group
52.92%
- Max
- 83.62%
- MT
- 52.92%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTR
Materials industry group
47.93%
- Max
- 83.62%
- NTR
- 47.93%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.99% | 3.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 52.92% | 47.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nutrien (NTR) at 15.61 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while ArcelorMittal (MT) at 44.51 sits in the richer quartile — MT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
MT
Materials industry group
44.51
- Max
- 59.00
- MT
- 44.51
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
NTR
Materials industry group
15.61
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- NTR
- 15.61
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
ArcelorMittal (MT) at 0.72 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Nutrien (NTR) at 1.24 prices around its industry’s middle — MT costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
MT
Materials industry group
0.72
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- MT
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.00
NTR
Materials industry group
1.24
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- NTR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both ArcelorMittal (MT) at 1.70 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.32 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
MT
Materials industry group
1.70
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- MT
- 1.70
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
NTR
Materials industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- NTR
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MT | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 44.51 | 15.61 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.72 | 1.24 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.70 | 1.32 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.75% | 5.77% |