MSI vs. UBER: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on August 18, 2025

Here’s a clear look at MSI and UBER, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

Symbol	MSI	UBER
Company Name	Motorola Solutions, Inc.	Uber Technologies, Inc.
Country	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Information Technology	Industrials
GICS Industry	Communications Equipment	Ground Transportation
Market Capitalization	78.34 billion USD	189.42 billion USD
Exchange	NYSE	NYSE
Listing Date	January 2, 1962	May 10, 2019
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MSI and UBER by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MSI vs. UBER: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

Symbol	MSI	UBER
5-Day Price Return	5.64%	-1.99%
13-Week Price Return	13.87%	3.10%
26-Week Price Return	-2.47%	29.78%
52-Week Price Return	13.92%	31.14%
Month-to-Date Return	7.11%	3.51%
Year-to-Date Return	1.72%	50.58%
10-Day Avg. Volume	1.24M	21.46M
3-Month Avg. Volume	0.96M	21.23M
3-Month Volatility	15.10%	32.88%
Beta	1.00	1.49

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MSI

127.51%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 32.05%
Q3: 19.58%
Median: 11.77%
Q1: 2.23%
Min: -11.93%

MSI’s Return on Equity of 127.51% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

UBER

62.42%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 22.11%
Q3: 13.84%
Median: 9.66%
Q1: 7.55%
Min: 0.36%

UBER’s Return on Equity of 62.42% is exceptionally high, placing it well beyond the typical range for the Ground Transportation industry. This demonstrates a superior ability to generate profit from shareholder investments, though it could also be inflated by high financial leverage.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MSI

19.08%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 23.65%
Q3: 14.32%
Median: 5.31%
Q1: 1.45%
Min: -12.72%

A Net Profit Margin of 19.08% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UBER

26.68%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 32.20%
Q3: 18.59%
Median: 7.11%
Q1: 4.13%
Min: -10.38%

A Net Profit Margin of 26.68% places UBER in the upper quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MSI

25.23%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 42.27%
Q3: 18.90%
Median: 6.21%
Q1: 2.97%
Min: -20.72%

An Operating Profit Margin of 25.23% places MSI in the upper quartile for the Communications Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UBER

9.03%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 41.31%
Q3: 23.16%
Median: 11.33%
Q1: 6.82%
Min: -12.08%

UBER’s Operating Profit Margin of 9.03% is around the midpoint for the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

Symbol	MSI	UBER
Return on Equity (TTM)	127.51%	62.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)	14.27%	24.38%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)	19.08%	26.68%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)	25.23%	9.03%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)	51.34%	33.93%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MSI

1.73

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.72
Q3: 1.72
Median: 1.46
Q1: 1.18
Min: 0.93

MSI’s Current Ratio of 1.73 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

UBER

1.11

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 2.03
Q3: 1.26
Median: 0.89
Q1: 0.73
Min: 0.38

UBER’s Current Ratio of 1.11 aligns with the median group of the Ground Transportation industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MSI

3.93

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 1.55
Q3: 0.92
Median: 0.55
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 3.93, MSI operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the Communications Equipment industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

UBER

0.42

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 2.51
Q3: 1.51
Median: 1.06
Q1: 0.47
Min: 0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Ground Transportation industry, UBER’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.42 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MSI

8.92

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 181.73
Q3: 113.63
Median: 7.59
Q1: 3.82
Min: -5.39

MSI’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 8.92 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Communications Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

UBER

-0.24

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 51.07
Q3: 22.54
Median: 7.94
Q1: 2.72
Min: -24.57

UBER has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -0.24. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

Symbol	MSI	UBER
Current Ratio (MRQ)	1.73	1.11
Quick Ratio (MRQ)	1.54	0.97
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)	3.93	0.42
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)	8.92	-0.24

Growth

Revenue Growth

MSI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MSI vs. UBER: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MSI

0.88%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 3.88%
Q3: 2.75%
Median: 0.93%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Yield of 0.88% is consistent with its peers in the Communications Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 5.44%
Q3: 2.49%
Median: 1.53%
Q1: 0.39%
Min: 0.00%

UBER currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MSI

32.70%

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 111.16%
Q3: 55.91%
Median: 28.42%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

MSI’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.70% is within the typical range for the Communications Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

UBER

0.00%

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 137.07%
Q3: 74.71%
Median: 41.16%
Q1: 15.12%
Min: 0.00%

UBER has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

Symbol	MSI	UBER
Dividend Yield (TTM)	0.88%	0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	32.70%	0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MSI

37.04

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 57.30
Q3: 47.92
Median: 27.50
Q1: 17.89
Min: 13.89

MSI’s P/E Ratio of 37.04 is within the middle range for the Communications Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UBER

14.99

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 42.59
Q3: 24.86
Median: 16.38
Q1: 12.79
Min: 4.37

UBER’s P/E Ratio of 14.99 is within the middle range for the Ground Transportation industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MSI

7.06

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 11.03
Q3: 5.53
Median: 2.20
Q1: 0.99
Min: 0.40

MSI’s P/S Ratio of 7.06 is in the upper echelon for the Communications Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

UBER

4.00

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 4.02
Q3: 2.20
Median: 1.23
Q1: 0.87
Min: 0.22

UBER’s P/S Ratio of 4.00 is in the upper echelon for the Ground Transportation industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MSI

35.66

Communications Equipment Industry

Max: 9.66
Q3: 5.60
Median: 3.73
Q1: 2.67
Min: 0.30

At 35.66, MSI’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Communications Equipment industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

UBER

8.63

Ground Transportation Industry

Max: 4.95
Q3: 2.78
Median: 1.38
Q1: 1.17
Min: 0.64

At 8.63, UBER’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Ground Transportation industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

MSI vs. UBER: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Communications Equipment and Ground Transportation industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

Symbol	MSI	UBER
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)	37.04	14.99
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)	7.06	4.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)	35.66	8.63
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)	32.87	22.17