Seek Returns logo

MSFT vs. UNH: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MSFT and UNH, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMSFTUNH
Company NameMicrosoft CorporationUnitedHealth Group Incorporated
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyHealth Care
GICS IndustrySoftwareHealth Care Providers & Services
Market Capitalization3,863.09 billion USD315.45 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 13, 1986October 17, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MSFT and UNH by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MSFT vs. UNH: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSFTUNH
5-Day Price Return2.50%0.79%
13-Week Price Return5.62%6.79%
26-Week Price Return33.06%-32.46%
52-Week Price Return20.78%-40.43%
Month-to-Date Return0.34%0.87%
Year-to-Date Return23.30%-31.15%
10-Day Avg. Volume21.67M9.34M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.04M15.42M
3-Month Volatility16.30%46.86%
Beta1.070.43

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
66.28%
Q3
21.28%
Median
9.33%
Q1
-8.77%
Min
-48.16%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

UNH

22.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
24.86%
Q3
15.79%
Median
8.56%
Q1
5.75%
Min
-1.64%

In the upper quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, UNH’s Return on Equity of 22.26% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
51.92%
Q3
19.23%
Median
6.98%
Q1
-7.14%
Min
-41.00%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

UNH

5.04%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
11.56%
Q3
5.45%
Median
2.83%
Q1
1.13%
Min
-1.71%

UNH’s Net Profit Margin of 5.04% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
60.40%
Q3
21.25%
Median
9.90%
Q1
-4.97%
Min
-43.50%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

UNH

7.26%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
19.08%
Q3
9.66%
Median
4.77%
Q1
2.46%
Min
-0.83%

UNH’s Operating Profit Margin of 7.26% is around the midpoint for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSFTUNH
Return on Equity (TTM)32.44%22.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)18.20%7.01%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)36.15%5.04%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)45.29%7.26%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.82%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
4.29
Q3
2.37
Median
1.40
Q1
1.03
Min
0.25

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

UNH

0.81

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.00
Q3
1.51
Median
1.29
Q1
0.92
Min
0.14

UNH’s Current Ratio of 0.81 falls into the lower quartile for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.16
Q3
0.86
Median
0.31
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

UNH

0.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
2.29
Q3
1.24
Median
0.74
Q1
0.50
Min
0.00

UNH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.79 is typical for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
89.65
Q3
32.64
Median
1.00
Q1
-9.84
Min
-71.23

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

UNH

6.14

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
14.47
Q3
7.50
Median
4.52
Q1
2.12
Min
-4.44

UNH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 6.14 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSFTUNH
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.350.81
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.350.60
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.260.79
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)891.806.14

Growth

Revenue Growth

MSFT vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MSFT vs. UNH: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MSFT

0.63%

Software Industry

Max
0.22%
Q3
0.11%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.63% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

UNH

2.47%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
5.93%
Q3
2.59%
Median
1.35%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Yield of 2.47% is consistent with its peers in the Health Care Providers & Services industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
3.29%
Q3
2.41%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

UNH

36.54%

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
185.33%
Q3
74.82%
Median
36.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

UNH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 36.54% is within the typical range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSFTUNH
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.63%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)23.65%36.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

37.47

Software Industry

Max
145.74
Q3
94.88
Median
45.35
Q1
26.66
Min
8.80

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 37.47 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

UNH

14.79

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
40.02
Q3
29.75
Median
21.09
Q1
14.18
Min
7.05

UNH’s P/E Ratio of 14.79 is within the middle range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

13.54

Software Industry

Max
25.67
Q3
13.68
Median
8.28
Q1
4.95
Min
0.90

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 13.54 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

UNH

0.74

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
3.15
Q3
1.87
Median
0.74
Q1
0.27
Min
0.09

UNH’s P/S Ratio of 0.74 aligns with the market consensus for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.67
Q3
14.92
Median
8.52
Q1
3.89
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

UNH

2.82

Health Care Providers & Services Industry

Max
7.33
Q3
4.45
Median
2.52
Q1
1.15
Min
0.66

UNH’s P/B Ratio of 2.82 is within the conventional range for the Health Care Providers & Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSFT vs. UNH: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Health Care Providers & Services industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSFTUNH
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)37.4714.79
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)13.540.74
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)10.762.82
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)53.2812.45