Seek Returns

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

MSFT vs. MU: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Here’s a clear look at MSFT and MU, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMSFTMU
Company NameMicrosoft CorporationMicron Technology, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS Industry GroupSoftware & ServicesSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS IndustrySoftwareSemiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment
GICS Sub-IndustrySystems SoftwareSemiconductors
Market Capitalization3,157.42 billion USD591.56 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateMarch 13, 1986June 1, 1984
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

MSFT’s market capitalization (3,157.42 billion USD) is substantially larger than MU’s (591.56 billion USD), indicating a significant difference in their market valuations.

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MSFT and MU by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MSFT+74.38%
MU+487.27%
MSFT vs. MU: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
5-Day Price Return0.16%16.73%
13-Week Price Return-8.83%31.25%
26-Week Price Return-17.80%153.69%
52-Week Price Return8.41%557.51%
Month-to-Date Return14.76%55.27%
Year-to-Date Return-12.16%83.79%
10-Day Avg. Volume35.84M38.05M
3-Month Avg. Volume33.75M39.40M
3-Month Volatility35.37%71.19%
Beta1.131.94

MU carries a higher beta at 1.94, indicating it’s more sensitive to market moves, while MSFT (beta: 1.13) exhibits greater stability.

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MSFT

33.61%

Software Industry
Max
66.41%
Q3
24.82%
Median
10.79%
Q1
-3.60%
Min
-39.77%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 33.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MU

40.84%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
48.79%
Q3
19.91%
Median
7.83%
Q1
-0.20%
Min
-30.27%

In the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s Return on Equity of 40.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

39.04%

Software Industry
Max
48.76%
Q3
19.52%
Median
12.27%
Q1
-2.45%
Min
-35.22%

A Net Profit Margin of 39.04% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MU

41.49%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
55.60%
Q3
22.64%
Median
10.31%
Q1
-0.69%
Min
-34.23%

A Net Profit Margin of 41.49% places MU in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MSFT

46.62%

Software Industry
Max
55.26%
Q3
25.01%
Median
13.33%
Q1
-3.22%
Min
-43.76%

An Operating Profit Margin of 46.62% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MU

48.34%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
60.38%
Q3
26.50%
Median
12.40%
Q1
1.78%
Min
-25.47%

An Operating Profit Margin of 48.34% places MU in the upper quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
Return on Equity (TTM)33.61%40.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)19.21%27.66%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)39.04%41.49%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)46.62%48.34%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)68.59%58.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

1.39

Software Industry
Max
3.83
Q3
2.27
Median
1.56
Q1
1.03
Min
0.47

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.39 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MU

2.90

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
7.65
Q3
4.51
Median
2.93
Q1
2.26
Min
1.23

MU’s Current Ratio of 2.90 aligns with the median group of the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry
Max
2.40
Q3
1.04
Median
0.30
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MU

0.14

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.34
Q3
0.56
Median
0.24
Q1
0.02
Min
0.00

MU’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.14 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry
Max
45.58
Q3
18.30
Median
2.30
Q1
-7.09
Min
-44.45

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MU

20.08

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
114.00
Q3
54.44
Median
14.73
Q1
2.52
Min
-45.50

MU’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.08 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.392.90
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.382.32
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.260.14
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)891.8020.08

Growth

Revenue Growth

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

Revenue Growth at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
Revenue Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)16.72%196.29%
Revenue Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)16.67%85.55%
3-Year Revenue CAGR12.42%6.71%
5-Year Revenue CAGR14.52%11.76%

EPS Growth

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
EPS Growth (MRQ vs Prior YoY)59.69%756.34%
EPS Growth (TTM vs Prior YoY)28.74%412.05%
3-Year EPS CAGR12.24%-0.66%
5-Year EPS CAGR18.80%26.15%

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MSFT

0.81%

Software Industry
Max
1.07%
Q3
0.45%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

With a Dividend Yield of 0.81%, MSFT offers a more attractive income stream than most of its peers in the Software industry, signaling a strong commitment to shareholder returns.

MU

0.09%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
1.86%
Q3
0.81%
Median
0.31%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Yield of 0.09% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

21.19%

Software Industry
Max
35.09%
Q3
15.51%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 21.19% is in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This indicates a strong commitment to shareholder returns but also suggests that a smaller portion of earnings is retained for reinvestment compared to many peers.

MU

2.19%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
168.19%
Q3
72.81%
Median
22.20%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MU’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 2.19% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.81%0.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)21.19%2.19%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

26.31

Software Industry
Max
118.55
Q3
59.07
Median
30.35
Q1
19.35
Min
9.51

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 26.31 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MU

24.28

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
177.19
Q3
102.35
Median
54.08
Q1
35.65
Min
13.81

In the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, MU’s P/E Ratio of 24.28 suggests the stock may be undervalued compared to its peers, potentially presenting an attractive entry point for investors.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MSFT

10.27

Software Industry
Max
17.34
Q3
9.21
Median
5.13
Q1
3.33
Min
0.79

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 10.27 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MU

10.07

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
32.21
Q3
15.98
Median
7.38
Q1
3.87
Min
1.17

MU’s P/S Ratio of 10.07 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MSFT

9.20

Software Industry
Max
25.50
Q3
12.31
Median
6.86
Q1
3.39
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 9.20 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MU

6.45

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry
Max
15.44
Q3
7.93
Median
3.86
Q1
1.89
Min
0.78

MU’s P/B Ratio of 6.45 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSFT vs. MU: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Software and Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSFTMU
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)26.3124.28
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.2710.07
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)9.206.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)40.5356.93