Seek Returns logo

MS vs. XOM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MS and XOM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMSXOM
Company NameMorgan StanleyExxon Mobil Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorFinancialsEnergy
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
Market Capitalization260.03 billion USD508.29 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 23, 1993January 2, 1962
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MS and XOM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MS vs. XOM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSXOM
5-Day Price Return-4.23%-1.75%
13-Week Price Return10.13%10.27%
26-Week Price Return21.68%8.48%
52-Week Price Return20.40%-2.39%
Month-to-Date Return-2.77%2.90%
Year-to-Date Return26.83%9.40%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.41M15.40M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.39M14.92M
3-Month Volatility21.92%18.11%
Beta1.220.37

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MS

15.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
41.61%
Q3
22.56%
Median
13.62%
Q1
9.23%
Min
-4.25%

MS’s Return on Equity of 15.07% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

XOM

11.42%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
16.09%
Median
9.55%
Q1
5.28%
Min
-10.03%

XOM’s Return on Equity of 11.42% is on par with the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MS

13.85%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
69.91%
Q3
36.88%
Median
24.30%
Q1
13.14%
Min
-6.20%

MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.85% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Capital Markets industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

XOM

9.22%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
43.98%
Q3
20.46%
Median
8.67%
Q1
2.52%
Min
-7.11%

XOM’s Net Profit Margin of 9.22% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MS

18.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
83.68%
Q3
47.64%
Median
32.36%
Q1
19.28%
Min
0.30%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 18.06% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

XOM

11.87%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
62.28%
Q3
30.55%
Median
17.92%
Q1
6.58%
Min
-25.19%

XOM’s Operating Profit Margin of 11.87% is around the midpoint for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSXOM
Return on Equity (TTM)15.07%11.42%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.24%6.63%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.85%9.22%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)18.06%11.87%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.99%29.97%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MS

0.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.43
Q3
1.76
Median
1.00
Q1
0.60
Min
0.04

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

XOM

1.14

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.59
Q3
1.69
Median
1.23
Q1
0.85
Min
0.31

XOM’s Current Ratio of 1.14 aligns with the median group of the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MS

7.60

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.12
Q3
2.78
Median
0.96
Q1
0.31
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

XOM

0.16

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
2.24
Q3
1.06
Median
0.53
Q1
0.25
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, XOM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.16 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
107.59
Q3
50.42
Median
10.94
Q1
4.37
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

XOM

20.20

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
41.04
Q3
20.96
Median
7.19
Q1
2.54
Min
-19.25

XOM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 20.20 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSXOM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.301.14
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.300.79
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.600.16
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.2520.20

Growth

Revenue Growth

MS vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MS vs. XOM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MS

2.50%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
8.63%
Q3
4.88%
Median
2.72%
Q1
1.41%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Yield of 2.50% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

XOM

3.57%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
11.17%
Q3
6.18%
Median
4.23%
Q1
2.56%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Yield of 3.57% is consistent with its peers in the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MS

40.12%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
188.84%
Q3
96.52%
Median
61.58%
Q1
31.74%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 40.12% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

XOM

57.54%

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
177.24%
Q3
98.32%
Median
58.16%
Q1
28.57%
Min
0.00%

XOM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 57.54% is within the typical range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSXOM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.50%3.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)40.12%57.54%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MS

16.05

Capital Markets Industry

Max
47.53
Q3
28.81
Median
16.62
Q1
12.06
Min
5.71

MS’s P/E Ratio of 16.05 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

XOM

16.12

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
38.10
Q3
21.29
Median
13.95
Q1
9.93
Min
2.48

XOM’s P/E Ratio of 16.12 is within the middle range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MS

2.22

Capital Markets Industry

Max
13.23
Q3
6.65
Median
4.40
Q1
2.22
Min
0.03

MS’s P/S Ratio of 2.22 aligns with the market consensus for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

XOM

1.49

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
4.76
Q3
2.81
Median
1.43
Q1
0.60
Min
0.15

XOM’s P/S Ratio of 1.49 aligns with the market consensus for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MS

2.30

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.83
Q3
5.27
Median
2.66
Q1
1.34
Min
0.37

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.30 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

XOM

1.84

Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels Industry

Max
3.63
Q3
2.11
Median
1.41
Q1
0.94
Min
0.45

XOM’s P/B Ratio of 1.84 is within the conventional range for the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MS vs. XOM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSXOM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)16.0516.12
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.221.49
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.301.84
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)11.8120.31