Seek Returns logo

MS vs. TM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MS and TM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

MS is a standard domestic listing, while TM trades as an American Depositary Receipt (ADR), offering U.S. investors access to its foreign-listed shares.

SymbolMSTM
Company NameMorgan StanleyToyota Motor Corporation
CountryUnited StatesJapan
GICS SectorFinancialsConsumer Discretionary
GICS IndustryCapital MarketsAutomobiles
Market Capitalization238.46 billion USD256.70 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateFebruary 23, 1993March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockADR

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MS and TM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MS vs. TM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMSTM
5-Day Price Return3.71%-1.31%
13-Week Price Return15.61%10.57%
26-Week Price Return13.43%4.51%
52-Week Price Return45.98%14.38%
Month-to-Date Return4.86%7.49%
Year-to-Date Return18.82%-7.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume4.20M22.70M
3-Month Avg. Volume5.50M28.85M
3-Month Volatility17.61%36.67%
Beta1.341.47

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MS

13.95%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
38.97%
Q3
21.61%
Median
13.77%
Q1
8.31%
Min
-4.25%

MS’s Return on Equity of 13.95% is on par with the norm for the Capital Markets industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

TM

12.02%

Automobiles Industry

Max
25.70%
Q3
12.88%
Median
6.92%
Q1
0.71%
Min
-15.89%

TM’s Return on Equity of 12.02% is on par with the norm for the Automobiles industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MS

13.06%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
66.67%
Q3
35.11%
Median
23.49%
Q1
13.63%
Min
-15.18%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, MS’s Net Profit Margin of 13.06% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

TM

8.82%

Automobiles Industry

Max
9.92%
Q3
5.78%
Median
3.23%
Q1
0.11%
Min
-5.31%

A Net Profit Margin of 8.82% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MS

17.07%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
86.40%
Q3
46.46%
Median
32.80%
Q1
18.32%
Min
-21.87%

MS’s Operating Profit Margin of 17.07% is in the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

TM

9.60%

Automobiles Industry

Max
13.07%
Q3
7.22%
Median
5.29%
Q1
0.43%
Min
-4.46%

An Operating Profit Margin of 9.60% places TM in the upper quartile for the Automobiles industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMSTM
Return on Equity (TTM)13.95%12.02%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.15%4.61%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)13.06%8.82%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)17.07%9.60%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)54.42%19.29%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MS

0.29

Capital Markets Industry

Max
3.76
Q3
1.89
Median
1.01
Q1
0.54
Min
-0.41

For the Capital Markets industry, the Current Ratio is often not the most suitable measure of short-term liquidity.

TM

1.27

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.19
Q3
1.54
Median
1.26
Q1
1.09
Min
0.48

TM’s Current Ratio of 1.27 aligns with the median group of the Automobiles industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MS

7.68

Capital Markets Industry

Max
6.62
Q3
2.84
Median
1.02
Q1
0.32
Min
0.00

The Debt-to-Equity Ratio is often not the primary focus for assessing leverage in the Capital Markets industry.

TM

1.07

Automobiles Industry

Max
2.34
Q3
1.13
Median
0.58
Q1
0.28
Min
0.06

TM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 1.07 is typical for the Automobiles industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MS

1.25

Capital Markets Industry

Max
126.03
Q3
60.98
Median
11.77
Q1
4.95
Min
-36.26

The Interest Coverage Ratio is often not a primary indicator of debt servicing capacity in the Capital Markets industry.

TM

--

Automobiles Industry

Max
77.87
Q3
42.86
Median
13.88
Q1
2.13
Min
-49.07

Interest Coverage Ratio data for TM is currently unavailable.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMSTM
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.291.27
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.291.11
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)7.681.07
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)1.25--

Growth

Revenue Growth

MS vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MS vs. TM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MS

2.78%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
10.26%
Q3
4.86%
Median
2.78%
Q1
1.22%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Yield of 2.78% is consistent with its peers in the Capital Markets industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

TM

3.09%

Automobiles Industry

Max
10.71%
Q3
5.39%
Median
3.14%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Yield of 3.09% is consistent with its peers in the Automobiles industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MS

43.20%

Capital Markets Industry

Max
200.72%
Q3
101.92%
Median
57.97%
Q1
32.36%
Min
0.00%

MS’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 43.20% is within the typical range for the Capital Markets industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

TM

38.83%

Automobiles Industry

Max
114.43%
Q3
59.30%
Median
37.15%
Q1
16.40%
Min
0.00%

TM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 38.83% is within the typical range for the Automobiles industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMSTM
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.78%3.09%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)43.20%38.83%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MS

15.56

Capital Markets Industry

Max
58.89
Q3
31.00
Median
18.54
Q1
12.09
Min
5.24

MS’s P/E Ratio of 15.56 is within the middle range for the Capital Markets industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TM

8.93

Automobiles Industry

Max
27.69
Q3
19.99
Median
9.85
Q1
6.60
Min
4.25

TM’s P/E Ratio of 8.93 is within the middle range for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MS

2.03

Capital Markets Industry

Max
14.49
Q3
7.41
Median
4.68
Q1
2.25
Min
0.04

In the lower quartile for the Capital Markets industry, MS’s P/S Ratio of 2.03 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

TM

0.79

Automobiles Industry

Max
1.52
Q3
0.84
Median
0.41
Q1
0.23
Min
0.08

TM’s P/S Ratio of 0.79 aligns with the market consensus for the Automobiles industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MS

2.08

Capital Markets Industry

Max
9.48
Q3
4.94
Median
2.42
Q1
1.21
Min
0.38

MS’s P/B Ratio of 2.08 is within the conventional range for the Capital Markets industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

TM

1.09

Automobiles Industry

Max
4.25
Q3
2.00
Median
0.87
Q1
0.46
Min
0.19

TM’s P/B Ratio of 1.09 is within the conventional range for the Automobiles industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MS vs. TM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Capital Markets and Automobiles industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMSTM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)15.568.93
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.030.79
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.081.09
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)10.4452.42