Seek Returns logo

MRVL vs. QXO: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MRVL and QXO, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMRVLQXO
Company NameMarvell Technology, Inc.QXO, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyIndustrials
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentTrading Companies & Distributors
Market Capitalization72.32 billion USD12.58 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 30, 2000April 17, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MRVL and QXO by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MRVL vs. QXO: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMRVLQXO
5-Day Price Return4.97%-0.94%
13-Week Price Return8.62%-11.51%
26-Week Price Return25.93%40.56%
52-Week Price Return18.43%21.17%
Month-to-Date Return33.73%-5.32%
Year-to-Date Return-23.88%19.87%
10-Day Avg. Volume29.14M8.80M
3-Month Avg. Volume22.04M9.04M
3-Month Volatility55.75%40.04%
Beta1.952.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MRVL

-0.77%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
47.13%
Q3
23.50%
Median
9.94%
Q1
0.86%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -0.77%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

QXO

-0.34%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
32.99%
Q3
19.66%
Median
13.72%
Q1
9.74%
Min
-0.34%

QXO has a negative Return on Equity of -0.34%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MRVL

-1.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.41%
Q3
23.88%
Median
10.17%
Q1
1.21%
Min
-32.15%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.43%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

QXO

-1.09%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
16.11%
Q3
9.48%
Median
5.89%
Q1
3.68%
Min
-1.09%

QXO has a negative Net Profit Margin of -1.09%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MRVL

1.29%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.09%
Q3
27.54%
Median
11.18%
Q1
3.31%
Min
-28.36%

MRVL’s Operating Profit Margin of 1.29% is in the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

QXO

-16.12%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
26.26%
Q3
14.59%
Median
7.05%
Q1
4.94%
Min
-8.06%

QXO has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -16.12%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMRVLQXO
Return on Equity (TTM)-0.77%-0.34%
Return on Assets (TTM)-0.51%-0.26%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-1.43%-1.09%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)1.29%-16.12%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)44.64%21.49%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

1.88

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
6.58
Q3
4.24
Median
2.73
Q1
2.13
Min
1.02

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.88 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

QXO

3.00

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
3.32
Q3
2.27
Median
1.60
Q1
1.41
Min
0.26

QXO’s Current Ratio of 3.00 is in the upper quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

0.33

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.48
Median
0.25
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.33 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

QXO

0.35

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
1.93
Q3
1.24
Median
0.79
Q1
0.61
Min
0.01

Falling into the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry, QXO’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.35 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
74.71
Median
26.06
Q1
6.43
Min
-7.80

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

QXO

-23.41

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
15.13
Q3
7.93
Median
5.67
Q1
2.04
Min
-1.67

QXO has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -23.41. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMRVLQXO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.883.00
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.362.10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.330.35
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.13-23.41

Growth

Revenue Growth

MRVL vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MRVL vs. QXO: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MRVL

0.29%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
3.72%
Q3
1.51%
Median
0.69%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.29% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

QXO

0.61%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
5.25%
Q3
2.95%
Median
2.06%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

QXO’s Dividend Yield of 0.61% is in the lower quartile for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

27.13%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
205.27%
Q3
88.01%
Median
27.13%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.13% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

QXO

0.00%

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
136.12%
Q3
71.34%
Median
47.49%
Q1
22.56%
Min
0.00%

QXO has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMRVLQXO
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.29%0.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.13%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
106.30
Q3
61.93
Median
38.96
Q1
23.71
Min
13.06

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

QXO

--

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
42.69
Q3
25.21
Median
16.99
Q1
13.13
Min
5.35

P/E Ratio data for QXO is currently unavailable.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

10.00

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
19.99
Q3
10.21
Median
5.23
Q1
2.88
Min
1.13

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 10.00 aligns with the market consensus for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

QXO

6.50

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
4.90
Q3
2.71
Median
1.06
Q1
0.70
Min
0.30

With a P/S Ratio of 6.50, QXO trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

4.92

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
14.22
Q3
6.94
Median
4.29
Q1
1.99
Min
0.67

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.92 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

QXO

1.46

Trading Companies & Distributors Industry

Max
7.55
Q3
4.63
Median
2.09
Q1
1.30
Min
0.31

QXO’s P/B Ratio of 1.46 is within the conventional range for the Trading Companies & Distributors industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MRVL vs. QXO: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Trading Companies & Distributors industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMRVLQXO
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.006.50
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.921.46
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)47.27104.40