Seek Returns logo

MRVL vs. MSFT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at MRVL and MSFT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolMRVLMSFT
Company NameMarvell Technology, Inc.Microsoft Corporation
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustrySemiconductors & Semiconductor EquipmentSoftware
Market Capitalization68.39 billion USD3,869.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJune 30, 2000March 13, 1986
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of MRVL and MSFT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

MRVL vs. MSFT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSFT
5-Day Price Return4.57%-0.05%
13-Week Price Return22.98%15.88%
26-Week Price Return-33.48%25.19%
52-Week Price Return31.09%27.97%
Month-to-Date Return-1.31%-2.42%
Year-to-Date Return-28.18%23.51%
10-Day Avg. Volume15.73M23.66M
3-Month Avg. Volume20.22M21.75M
3-Month Volatility48.98%15.92%
Beta1.921.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

MRVL

-3.62%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
52.74%
Q3
23.49%
Median
11.60%
Q1
3.23%
Min
-20.69%

MRVL has a negative Return on Equity of -3.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

MSFT

32.44%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

In the upper quartile for the Software industry, MSFT’s Return on Equity of 32.44% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

MRVL

-7.56%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
44.17%
Q3
22.38%
Median
11.95%
Q1
3.21%
Min
-25.16%

MRVL has a negative Net Profit Margin of -7.56%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

MSFT

36.15%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

A Net Profit Margin of 36.15% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

MRVL

-4.57%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
58.03%
Q3
27.84%
Median
12.45%
Q1
5.15%
Min
-28.61%

MRVL has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -4.57%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

MSFT

45.29%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

An Operating Profit Margin of 45.29% places MSFT in the upper quartile for the Software industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSFT
Return on Equity (TTM)-3.62%32.44%
Return on Assets (TTM)-2.45%18.20%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-7.56%36.15%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-4.57%45.29%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)43.17%68.82%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

1.30

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
8.42
Q3
4.70
Median
2.75
Q1
2.07
Min
1.04

MRVL’s Current Ratio of 1.30 falls into the lower quartile for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

MSFT

1.35

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

MSFT’s Current Ratio of 1.35 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

0.32

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
1.09
Q3
0.45
Median
0.22
Q1
0.01
Min
0.00

MRVL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.32 is typical for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MSFT

0.26

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

MSFT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.26 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

-4.13

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
174.00
Q3
81.10
Median
27.22
Q1
7.28
Min
-4.26

MRVL has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -4.13. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

MSFT

891.80

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 891.80, MSFT demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSFT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.301.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.891.35
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.320.26
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)-4.13891.80

Growth

Revenue Growth

MRVL vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

MRVL vs. MSFT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

MRVL

0.30%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
4.16%
Q3
1.78%
Median
0.74%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Yield of 0.30% is consistent with its peers in the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MSFT

0.61%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MSFT’s Dividend Yield of 0.61% is exceptionally high, placing it well above the typical range for the Software industry. While this may seem attractive, an unusually high yield can sometimes be a warning sign, reflecting a falling stock price or market concerns about the dividend’s sustainability.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

27.43%

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
196.12%
Q3
87.72%
Median
26.57%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MRVL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.43% is within the typical range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MSFT

23.65%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

At 23.65%, MSFT’s Dividend Payout Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical range for the Software industry. While this provides a significant return to shareholders, it may limit funds for reinvestment and could be difficult to sustain.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSFT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.30%0.61%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)27.43%23.65%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

--

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
109.37
Q3
57.11
Median
28.95
Q1
22.13
Min
11.14

P/E Ratio data for MRVL is currently unavailable.

MSFT

38.73

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

MSFT’s P/E Ratio of 38.73 is within the middle range for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

MRVL

10.52

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
16.09
Q3
10.10
Median
4.82
Q1
2.60
Min
0.93

MRVL’s P/S Ratio of 10.52 is in the upper echelon for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MSFT

14.00

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

MSFT’s P/S Ratio of 14.00 is in the upper echelon for the Software industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

MRVL

4.02

Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry

Max
13.56
Q3
6.75
Median
3.68
Q1
1.89
Min
0.60

MRVL’s P/B Ratio of 4.02 is within the conventional range for the Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MSFT

10.76

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

MSFT’s P/B Ratio of 10.76 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

MRVL vs. MSFT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolMRVLMSFT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)--38.73
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)10.5214.00
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)4.0210.76
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)49.9255.07