MPC vs. WDS: Marathon Petroleum vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do Marathon Petroleum (MPC) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though MPC is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Marathon Petroleum Corp. | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 101.49 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 24, 2011 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 104.94% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 42.97% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 45.42% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.53% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.56 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -44.75% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.56M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.68 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 4.10 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 60.46% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
MPC
Energy industry group
60.46%
- MPC
- 60.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 8.34% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
8.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- MPC
- 8.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 17.98% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
MPC
Energy industry group
17.98%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- MPC
- 17.98%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 60.46% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 13.75% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 8.34% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.98% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 16.20% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at -4.44% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 31.15% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for MPC.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -4.44% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.23% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 31.15% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -22.24% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.45 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.45
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- MPC
- 1.45
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.15 uses more debt funding than most peers.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.15
- Max
- 1.75
- MPC
- 1.15
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.45 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.15 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.88 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 1.09% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
MPC
Energy industry group
1.09%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- MPC
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.93% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
MPC
Energy industry group
7.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- MPC
- 7.93%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.09% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 7.93% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 7.39 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for MPC, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
MPC
Energy industry group
7.39
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- MPC
- 7.39
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 0.58 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
MPC
Energy industry group
0.58
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- MPC
- 0.58
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Marathon Petroleum (MPC) at 4.42 prices above its benchmark range — MPC looks rich relative to book.
MPC
Energy industry group
4.42
- MPC
- 4.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MPC | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 7.39 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.58 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.42 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 16.00% | 1.41% |